Re: [wsjt-devel] Transverter Offset

2023-07-18 Thread Charles Suckling via wsjt-devel
Hi Tom I enter the offset as a number with no commas or decimal point. In the station information table it then appears with comma separator and decimal points [image: image.png] This is on a UK purchased PC, running 2.7.0-rc2 73 Charlie DL3WDG On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 at 22:45, tom via wsjt-d

[wsjt-devel] c2 files written after signals subtracted

2023-07-18 Thread Tolboom, Ryan via wsjt-devel
Good Evening, When using wsprd in multi-pass mode (no '-s' option) and passing it the '-c' option to write a c2 file, it writes the c2 file at the end of the main loop on the first pass AFTER it subtracts out the decoded candidates. This means if you're using the c2 file to do analysis of the IQ d

Re: [wsjt-devel] Transverter Offset

2023-07-18 Thread Harry E. Hoffman via wsjt-devel
Hi Tom, You don't enter the comma or the space they just show up in the list that way after you enter them. While I don't use a transverter for 23 centimeters I made the entries as follows to test the function. Band 23cm Offset -1268.00 Then added to the upper list as follows: Region

Re: [wsjt-devel] Transverter Offset

2023-07-18 Thread tom via wsjt-devel
Thanks all. Yes I was following all comments - I have no issue at all with 2m or 70cms offsets - same version of Windows, same rig (TS680) same copy of WSJT. Yes saving all settings with the OK. Yes was entering -1268 as offset - one thing - could someone confirm the format of the offset on yo

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X published to WinGet

2023-07-18 Thread Chris Keller via wsjt-devel
Fair point, Neal. The pull request process means there is human review and approval, plus a set of automated malware checks, but it's certainly not foolproof. If security is a top concern, building from source is probably the best bet. On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 9:49 AM Neal Pollack via wsjt-devel <

Re: [wsjt-devel] Transverter Offset

2023-07-18 Thread Harry E. Hoffman via wsjt-devel
Hi Tom, Appending my post: The offset frequency is a negative number so it should read: Band = 23 cm Offset = -1268.000 000 (note the decimal point and the space) I am using an IC-7300 as the IF radio on my system and my transverter settings for 1.25 meters and 33 centimeters work fine. I don

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X published to WinGet

2023-07-18 Thread Neal Pollack via wsjt-devel
Regarding the winget repository for installs, and your statement: " *This is great for automated system installs! I'll attempt to keep the version here up-to-date, but any developer can submit manifest updates via GitHub pull request.*"; Am I misunderstanding that this is a terrible security risk,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Transverter Offset

2023-07-18 Thread Harry E. Hoffman via wsjt-devel
Hi Tom, I use transverters for 1.25 meters and 33 centimeters, using the the same idea try this for 23 centimeters. Band = 23 cm Offset = 1268.000 000 (note the decimal point and the space) Check the frequency list and if there are no entries for 23 cm add them for the modes you want. Exam

Re: [wsjt-devel] Transverter Offset

2023-07-18 Thread Andrew Neumeier via wsjt-devel
Tom, I use a transverter as well.  Do make sure you have entered the frequency you are using in the 'Frequencies' list in 'Settings'.  Without doing that, the rig's frequency can/will jump elsewhere.  Good luck and 73, Andy, ka2uqw On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 06:51:28 AM EDT, tom via ws

Re: [wsjt-devel] Transverter Offset

2023-07-18 Thread Charles Suckling via wsjt-devel
Hi Tom If its a bug, its not present with all setups, as it works for me fine, and always has. Operating systems Win7 and 10, but a different radio to yours. Did you remember to press OK to close the Frequencies window? Else it doesn't store the new offset you have entered. 73 Charlie DL3WDG

[wsjt-devel] Transverter Offset

2023-07-18 Thread tom via wsjt-devel
Hi - posted on main list but no final solution. Windows 11, wsjt-X 2.6.2 and 2.7.0-rc2 Setting up a 23cms Transverter with a 28 MHz IF - seems to be an issue. Used an offset -1268 and wsjt-x displayed 23cms ok but cat jumped rig to 1.065 MHz. Tried the example given on archive for 2m offset -1