[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v2.7.1-devel 240712 improved widescreen PLUS => Crash in SuperHound mode

2024-07-12 Thread Kari Sillanmäki via wsjt-devel
Hi, SuperHound mode crashed with runtime error: Computer: Raspberry Pi 4 OS: Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm) 64 bit Radio: ICOM IC7300 I left system running overnight and this morning I was greeted by the error message above... 73 de Kari, oh2gqc _

Re: [wsjt-devel] Superfox problem

2024-07-12 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Do a Hamlib update on the Rig tab and if it still doesn't work Please place this file as described below https://www.dropbox.com/s/t52ngcalsgnpm8m/wsjtx_log_config.ini?dl=1 C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Local\WSJT-X The WSJT-X_Rigcontrol.log file will be in the same location Here's

Re: [wsjt-devel] V2.70-rc5 defect report

2024-07-12 Thread Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel
Hi Andy, Thanks for your report -- it's much appreciated. We're aware of the problems you identified, and we plan to have them corrected in time for the next release. -- Joe, K1JT On 7/12/2024 2:40 PM, Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel wrote: WIn 64 bit, OS Win 8.1 ALL.TX log does not co

Re: [wsjt-devel] Superfox problem

2024-07-12 Thread Frederick Kepner via wsjt-devel
Have you checked to see that the correct COM port is selected? 73 Fred K3FRK On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 5:40 PM Peter Wollenberg via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hi > > I have operated WSJT V 2.6.1 with great success and no problems for many > month using a WIN7 laptop in

[wsjt-devel] Superfox problem

2024-07-12 Thread Peter Wollenberg via wsjt-devel
Hi I have operated WSJT V 2.6.1 with great success and no problems for many month using a WIN7 laptop into an ICOM 7600 radio. Now installed the 2.7.0 RC5 software and the pc now longer communicates with the radio as the frequencies are not displayed on the software screen, just showing 0. All m

Re: [wsjt-devel] No audio output to FT-710 with Raspberry pi

2024-07-12 Thread Steve Brown via wsjt-devel
I did some further testing. I have pipewire disabled and am only using alsa. If I use aplay to send to the FT-710 sound device, it succeeds. If I open any one of the two serial ports with something like "cat /dev/ttyUSB0", aplay shows reset errors in syslog. So, this is not pipewire, wsjtx or ham

[wsjt-devel] V2.70-rc5 defect report

2024-07-12 Thread Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel
WIn 64 bit, OS Win 8.1 ALL.TX log does not correctly record the decode window text and the QSO frequency: - Decode window: 181330 -1 0.2 730 K3WYC K8R RR73 181330 -1 0.2 730OZ3AEV K8R RR73 181330 -1 0.2 730G4WFQ K8R -18 181330 -1 0.2 730KA6RWL K8R -12 181330 -1 0.2 730

Re: [wsjt-devel] RC5 Defect - no udp decode messages for SuperFox decodes.

2024-07-12 Thread Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel
Hi Laurie, Thanks for this heads-up. SuperFox features are still in a fairly early stage of development. We need to get the basic operation right, first, and to gain some experience from in-the-field operation. We'll hope to satisfy the need you've identified in the next release.

[wsjt-devel] RC5 Defect - no udp decode messages for SuperFox decodes.

2024-07-12 Thread Laurie, VK3AMA via wsjt-devel
RC5 does not produce udp decode messages (#2) for SuperFox decodes. Is this a defect or by design? Without the decodes there is no way for JTAlert to notify a station they were called by the fox nor to highlight their callsign (the called station) in the Activity display. de Laurie VK3AMA (J

Re: [wsjt-devel] Flex hamlib step back

2024-07-12 Thread k0vm via wsjt-devel
Yes  I have been using without port number, Just the radios host name. AL, K0VM On 7/12/2024 6:51 AM, Black Michael wrote: Good -- you should also find the port# is not necessary and Hamlib will, in fact, override anything you put in for port#.  That's because the Flex protocol is always on p

Re: [wsjt-devel] Flex hamlib step back

2024-07-12 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Good -- you should also find the port# is not necessary and Hamlib will, in fact, override anything you put in for port#.  That's because the Flex protocol is always on port 4992.  It will also complain with that same message now if you use 127.0.0.1 with that better error message. Mike W9MDB