Joe,
Wishing your wife a speedy recovery. Now you have to do the grocery shopping😄
Danny AH6FX … AH6FX/W4
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
On Tuesday, July 23, 2024, 3:48 PM, Jim Preston via wsjt-devel
wrote:
Joe,
My thoughts and prayers are with both of you.
73,
Jim N6V
Understandably, a number of people have asked us about how SuperFox
works. I have explained that we are intentionally moving slowly and
deliberately in our early tests, and we have not published source code
or specifications in part because many details may still change.
The basic SuperFox sc
+1 to Hasan - nobody is forcing anyone to use SF. You're spending more
time splitting hairs about this than any useful output and wasting
everyone's time and bandwidth - the Dev list is becoming less useful as
a result.
Go ahead and develop your own thing if all you are going to do is point
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 02:19:51PM +0100, Hibby via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Identity and keysigning is a solved problem
True.
What is required here is a public-key signature scheme.
The fox produces a key pair and publishes the public key
which is then used by the hounds.
The problem is that all p
How so?
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 14:05, Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Yes, congratulations are in order. You have now made it easy for the
> Pirates, before it was somewhat more difficult.
> Way to go.
> Hasan
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 7:31 AM Jonathan M
Joe,
Thanks for taking the time to improve my understanding of how WSJT-X frequency
control and reporting is designed to work. The design may be intuitive for a
VHF/UHF operator but it certainly was not for me as someone who only works HF
and 6 m chasing DX.
I think what I'd like to do is run
Hey Neil,
Don't worry - bubble not burst. I'm choosing to not pick a fight about the
specific licensing of the binaries. Arguments about licensing are full of
opinions and not very fun. They usually end up in flame wars and cold
disagreement, as I think we can see from the previous discussion.
Hate to burst your bubble, the binaries do NOT have to be stripped, as
they can be included as an exception to the GPL license.
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 7/24/2024 4:05 AM, Hibby wrote:
Hi all,
Turns out you can't tell furries that a superfox is proprietary!
https://sprocketfox.io/xssfox/2024/07/24/sup
Hi Hasan,
To be clear, Jonathan has so far posted to the list and not facilitated any
pirates!
To summarise what is going on (and separate from any tedious license
discussions) - in the interests of preventing DXPedition piracy, some people
are playing with the new binaries and have surmised t
Hasan,
No. An insecure algorithm, that no-one has had any opportunity to review
due to the source code for the superfox binaries not being published, has
made it no more difficult than it previously was for the pirates.
Jonathan, GI3JMC
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 2:03 PM Hasan N0AN
wrote:
> Yes,
Yes, congratulations are in order. You have now made it easy for the
Pirates, before it was somewhat more difficult.
Way to go.
Hasan
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 7:31 AM Jonathan McComb via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hasan,
>
> Did you actually take the time to read **an
Hasan,
Did you actually take the time to read **and understand** the blog post I
linked, and the contents of the similar discussions (linked below)
regarding the superfox binaries in the mailing list?
https://sourceforge.net/p/wsjt/mailman/wsjt-devel/thread/ZoMmzGysLjXJ5B2O%40msg.df7cb.de/#msg587
Jonathon,
Then don't use SuperFox
Hasan
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 5:25 AM Jonathan McComb via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> https://sprocketfox.io/xssfox/2024/07/24/superflawed/
>
> The Superfox mode uses security by obscurity, (which is never a good
> thing) by failing t
Today I had my first attempt to work K8R on 12m,
I obtained fairly quickly a report, and sent TX3 in response but received
no RR73 from them. Decodes were solid, so I did not miss any message
containing the RR73.
TX messages from me continued with TX3 until I manually ceased (after about
8 repe
https://sprocketfox.io/xssfox/2024/07/24/superflawed/
The Superfox mode uses security by obscurity, (which is never a good thing)
by failing to publish any source code for the dedicated superfox binaries
to allow for peer review. It is exceptionally misguided.
Amateur Radio should be available to
Hi all,
Turns out you can't tell furries that a superfox is proprietary!
https://sprocketfox.io/xssfox/2024/07/24/superflawed/
After I mentioned my disappointment and concern about the implications of
closed binaries in this week's zero retries [1], including making users in
debian, ubuntu, r
16 matches
Mail list logo