Re: [wsjt-devel] Echo Mode issue

2024-09-07 Thread Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel
Hi John, If you are subscribed still on the [WSJTX] list, then you got answers Monday and Tuesday on that list Subject 'Echo mode issue #adif'. 73, Reino OH3mA ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net

[wsjt-devel] Echo Mode issue

2024-09-07 Thread John Broughton via wsjt-devel
set and found it is not set. Here is an example from my WSJT-X wsjtx_log.adi file: JH7AUL QM07 FT8 +03 +00 20240907 015215 20240907 015245 12m 24.917666 WB9VGJ DM34TQ 90 ECH I hope you or someone can provide an answer to me on why this is happening. It is happening with version v2.6.1

Re: [wsjt-devel] SuperFox and FT8: Weak-Signal Performance

2024-09-07 Thread Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel
Hi Joe, Thanks for those results. Yes, SF behaves well on those conditions and FT8 may be close to the edge that is obvious in the HM model. I was eager to see whether the 10 ms Doppler spread starts to affect to the high SNR performance, it may or may not. It's not an important information, just

Re: [wsjt-devel] SuperFox and FT8: Weak-Signal Performance

2024-09-07 Thread Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel
Hi Reino, We could do simulations for the "High-latitude Moderate" (HM) channel, of course, but have not done do. We do know that FT8 does not do very well under such conditions (Doppler spread = 10 Hz, Differential delay 3 ms): see Figure 7 and Table 6 of our QEX paper on FT4 and FT8, here:

Re: [wsjt-devel] SuperFox and FT8: Weak-Signal Performance

2024-09-07 Thread Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel
Joe, Thank you about the excellent document. It does clarify where we are at the fight against noise and signal spreading. I am interested to see also results for the "High-latitude Moderate" propagation model for SF. FT8 have a lot of difficulties on that kind path as presented in Figure 7 of T