Re: [wsjt-devel] Average DT Time

2018-12-06 Thread Andrew Ellis via wsjt-devel
Thanks, Joe! Good info. Andrew NO6E ⁣Sent from BlueMail ​ On Dec 6, 2018, 09:22, at 09:22, Joe Taylor wrote: >Hi all, > >A number of comments and questions have appeared here recently >concerning the parameter DT displayed by the WSJT-X decoders. > >K6AVP: >> Only a few have posted what range of

Re: [wsjt-devel] "NO RCV 75 BIT"

2018-11-29 Thread Andrew Ellis via wsjt-devel
I agree. It's an educational process.  It does serve a purpose: It allows those who  decode, but cannot send 77 bit messages see why I'm not answering them. 73, Andrew NO6E "RC5 77 BIT" Rogue River / Bandon, OR On Nov 29, 2018, 09:51, at 09:51, Gary Hinson wrote: >Hi Wolfgang. > >I'm aiming my

Re: [wsjt-devel] Summary of early results with WSJT-X 2.0-RC3

2018-10-18 Thread Andrew Ellis via wsjt-devel
Many thanks, Joe! Installed SSL fix, then -RC3. Upload to LOTW was fine. On another topic: Thanks for the change in frequency-swap arrows that came out in -RC2. Much clearer now. 73, Andrew Ellis NO6E ⁣Sent from BlueMail ​ On Oct 18, 2018, 11:04, at 11:04, Joe Taylor wrote: >Hi all, > >Accord

Re: [wsjt-devel] Autoseq on previous QSO

2018-10-15 Thread Andrew Ellis via wsjt-devel
Yep. I'm with Carey. Tail-ending is a time-honored tradition in other modes. It works on FT8. Andew Ellis NO6E Rogue River / Bandon, OR ⁣Sent from BlueMail ​ On Oct 15, 2018, 11:24, at 11:24, Carey Fisher wrote: >I tail-end a lot. I've gotten a lot of contacts that way without >waiting >for a