nutes. Upon return, that is when I may see a false decode.
Some coarse language has been used in the beginning for missing them, until
I realized they were false decodes, as they are usually for DX I can only
dream about.
Regards,
Vince, VA3VF
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 9:36 AM DXer wrote:
> I
I thought it was just the 'price to pay' for AP and deep decoding. If this
is being treated as a bug, I'm also seeing it. Something like 2 to 3 times
an hour, just to frame it in a period of time.
There is another interesting situation happening, but only if you use
JTAlert to monitor and initiate
A returnee from JTDX.
RC2 has been great, no problems so far. Decoding is very good.
One request. In addition to the CQ only box, would it be possible to
also offer a 73/RR73 box that would add to the CQ only option?
Thanks and 73.
Vince, VA3VF
_
Another observation.
Scenario:
I'm following a QSO between 2 other stations. Before the station I'm
interested in contacting sends his/her final 73, I set everything up for a
tail ending call.
However, when the 73 message is received, Tx is disabled, and I have to
click enable Tx again, possibly
The following situation occurs when Call 1st is selected.
I call CQ, two stations answer, Call 1st 'engages' with one of the
stations, but I want the other one. The only way I found to override the
Call 1st choice is to stop Tx, click on the station I want , and start Tx
again. The time required t
1)W9MDB's first name is misspelled in the new Copyright Notice;
2)When Tx watchdog is reached, the red message appears, but it still Tx
one more cycle, while also scrolling the waterfall as in normal receive.
73 de Vince, VA3VF
-
gnals would go a long way toward improving the situation. If
it were automatic, then newbies would not be a problem.
Ted
K9IMM
-Original Message-
From: DXer [mailto:hfdxmoni...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2017 10:44 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel
Hi Ted,
I don't speak for the developers. I'm simply a user.
What you are suggesting can easily be done now by a proficient operator.
I use N1MM+, and what they did was mitigate poor operating practices,
after all education attempts had failed.
There are people out there that will click on a
Jim, Joe,
Working fine answering a CQ in JTAlert in the format CQ NA EA3RT JN01.
73 de Vince, VA3VF
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/
2017-09-30 2:35 PM, DXer wrote:
Sorry...I widthdraw this last comment. It does happen as Jim describes,
even with Hold Tx Freq checked.
On 2017-09-30 2:31 PM, DXer wrote:
I can duplicate what you are seeing only if a check Hold Tx Freq.
Vince, VA3VF
On 2017-09-30 2:22 PM, James Shaver wrote
Sorry...I widthdraw this last comment. It does happen as Jim describes,
even with Hold Tx Freq checked.
On 2017-09-30 2:31 PM, DXer wrote:
I can duplicate what you are seeing only if a check Hold Tx Freq.
Vince, VA3VF
On 2017-09-30 2:22 PM, James Shaver wrote:
Correction: when responding to
I can duplicate what you are seeing only if a check Hold Tx Freq.
Vince, VA3VF
On 2017-09-30 2:22 PM, James Shaver wrote:
Correction: when responding to a CQ via the UDP server using JTAlert,
the RX will move and the TX does not unless you hold the control key
down which may cause issues for s
Interesting, not here.
73 de Vince, VA3VF
On 2017-09-30 2:22 PM, James Shaver wrote:
Correction: when responding to a CQ via the UDP server using JTAlert,
the RX will move and the TX does not unless you hold the control key
down which may cause issues for some.
Sorry, my fingers are moving f
Hi Jim,
By using UTP server to respond, do you you mean clicking on the callsign
in JTAlert? If yes, it's working for me, that is, both Tx and Rx move to
the same frequency as the CQ calling station.
73 de Vince, VA3VF
On 2017-09-30 2:19 PM, James Shaver wrote:
Works well but when using the
On the air with r8146. Everything working as described.
73 de Vince, VA3VF
On 2017-09-30 2:00 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi all,
The following is the commit message for r8146:
If you can build r8146 for yourself and try it on the air, please post
your comments here.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
---
Bill,
I was checking JTAlert to see what had changed, but it's working again
on r8144. Not sure if it's related, just an FYI.
73 de Vince, VA3VF
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engag
Thank you, K1JT.
I think you found a good compromise for all the Tx=RX related wants and
needs.
73 de Vince, VA3VF
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
17 matches
Mail list logo
