If you don't print the RR73, then repeat your QSL/exchange message. If you
never receive the RR73, then don't log the QSO. How many times you repeat
your QSL/exchange message is a judgment call. It's a tradeoff between
completing the QSO and moving on to the next
RR73 completes the QSO. Both QSO partners have sent calls, exchanges and
QSLs. Am additional 73 message is a waste of time.73,Ed W0YK
Original message From: sdegroff via wsjt-devel
Date: 10/21/23 13:18 (GMT-08:00) To: WSJT
software development Cc: sdegroff
Subject: Re
+173,Ed W0YK
Original message From: Ron WV4P via wsjt-devel
Date: 10/21/23 13:02 (GMT-08:00) To: WSJT
software development Cc: Ron WV4P
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73? I wish
this was THE way, the useless final 73 should have never existed and is the
That would be wonderful, Will. But, I understand the expense obstacle.73,Ed
W0YK
Original message From: Will Shattuck
Date: 3/2/23 17:17 (GMT-08:00) To: e...@w0yk.com Cc: rttydigi...@groups.io,
r...@groups.io, m...@wsjtx.groups.io, WSJT software development
Subject: Re
CQ RU is fine. CQ FTRU is just one example.73,Ed W0YK
Original message From: John Date: 12/3/20
02:38 (GMT-08:00) To: e...@w0yk.com, 'WSJT software development'
Subject: RE: [wsjt-devel] FT Roundup
Practice Sessions Hi Ed,Ne is back to CQ RUIndeed, it would be n
RR73 is not part of the exchange from a contest rules perspective. However, it
is a highly recommended messaging element to help QSO partners best decide if
the QSO is complete and loggable. This is true for CW, SSB, RTTY, etc as
well.73,Ed W0YK
Original message From: Jim
2000-2100z, Friday, 6 December 0200-0300z, Saturday, 7 December (Friday
evening, NA time).Use bands that are open and active for you. Frequencies per
the rules. Make the most of the opportunity to test hardware, software and the
operator. 73,Ed W0YK
The native log (N1Mm or WriteLog) can have 'FT4' or 'FT8', as can the ADIF
log. But the Cabrillo specification only provides for 'DG', which is only used
for contest log checking purposes.73,Ed W0YK
Original message From: Claude Frantz
Date:
'DG'The complete Cabrillo template is at ww-digi.com/cabrillo.htm73,Ed W0YK
Original message From: Claude Frantz
Date: 7/20/19 02:36 (GMT-08:00) To:
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Announcing the World
Wide Digi DX Contest On 6/29/19 10:
Where did you submit the log? It must be submitted in the ARRL Log Submission
web page, not the old robot email address.
73,Ed W0YK
Original message From: Don Hill AA5AU
Date: 1/20/19 18:43 (GMT-08:00) To: 'WSJT software development'
Subject: [wsjt-devel] v2.0.
Either *.cbr or *.log are fine.73,Ed W0YK
Original message From: Tom Ramberg Date:
12/2/18 23:19 (GMT-08:00) To: 'WSJT software development'
, Ed Muns Subject: Re:
[wsjt-devel] FW: [rttydigital] FT8 Roundup Logs Received Page
Our log from OH2K was saved
My view is still 'no', don't break rhythm by going into a side discussion about
dupes.If such messages are created, I will avoid using them, if possble.73,Ed
W0YK
Original message From: n...@comcast.net Date: 11/29/18 11:57
(GMT-08:00) To: j...@princeton.
Yes, 2018!Typo, sorry.73,Ed W0YK
Original message From: AJ Fite Date:
11/14/18 22:36 (GMT-08:00) To: e...@w0yk.com,
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: r...@groups.io, NCCC Main Reflector
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Roundup, 1-2 December 2018 Just
to double check, you
13 matches
Mail list logo
