On 7/17 Jim Brown K9YC wrote:
> BUT -- a question emerged. There were several other signals on the band
> last night with solidly visible traces for the entire 2 minute period,
> but when I moved the window to include a few hundred Hz to include them,
> they didn't decode, but WB6CXC did. Does FST
Is this the 160 m signal of what's described here?
http://wb6cxc.com/?p=451
If so, the mode is FST4W-120. There should be similar signals on all bands from
160 m through 6m.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
From: Jim Brown via wsjt-devel
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2025 7:34 P
wsjt-devel
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2025 3:14 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jim Brown
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?
Hi Joe,
On 6/6/2025 8:42 AM, Joseph Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote:
> We (developers of the digital protocols in WSJT and its sister programs)
&g
Hi Jim, K9YC:
You write here of "major errors," "massive failures," "developers living in
their own world," "failing to consult with other users of the spectrum," etc.,
etc.
You write: "The major error that developers made way back when, and CONTINUE to
make, is to chew up way too much spectru
Marco --
Your feelings are very wrong.
— 73, Joe, K1JT
From: Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2025 8:07 PM
To: 'WSJT software development'
Cc: Marco Calistri
Subject: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - E.O.L.?
Hello,
I'm feeling kind of premonition th
Hi Nico,
WSJT-X has no way of knowing that you disabled a second screen. But the
"missing" window is still alive. It may be visible in your system tray, and can
be moved from there manually.
— Joe, K1JT
From: nico--- via wsjt-devel
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2025 1:
Please, guys! ... The purpose of this email list is to aid development of
WSJT and its sister programs. It is not the place for discussing relative
merits of different OS varieties and versions.
— 73, Joe, K1JT
From: Joe via wsjt-devel
Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2
Hi Rick,
Why should you be surprised? The calls you list do not have the format
specified in the WSJT-X User Guide for a standard callsign.
https://wsjt.sourceforge.io/wsjtx-doc/wsjtx-main-2.7.0.html#PROTOCOLS
"A standard amateur callsign consists of a one- or two-character prefix, at
least one
Please read about nonstandard and compound callsigns in the WSJT-X User Guide,
Section 7.5:
https://wsjt.sourceforge.io/wsjtx-doc/wsjtx-main-2.7.0.html#COMP-CALL
In particular, note this sentence:
"WSJT-X 2.7 offers no support for two nonstandard callsigns to work each other."
-- 73, Joe
The WSJT Development Team is pleased to announce the WSJT-X 2.7.0 General
Availability (GA) release. This is the first GA release since version 2.6.1,
two years ago. Major enhancements include a new companion program called QMAP,
new Special Operating Activities called “Q65 Pileup” and “SuperFox
On 7/31/2024 9:32 AM, Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel wrote:
The problem I reported can be fixed either by using dial
frequency or by using dial frequency + tone offset.
You seem unwilling to accept that the "problem" you reported does not
exist if you follow the instructions we gave you. Repeate
11 matches
Mail list logo
