Hi Marco,
The drop in traffic is also caused by the stability of WSJT-X. Stable =
few questions.
73 -- Larry -- W1DYJ
On 5/31/2025 22:08, Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi Lance,
I'm using FT8 for the 99% of my ham radio activity.
I don't know Q65 mode at all, nor EME QSO.
I aske
$$$ and upgrade difficulty, especially if the CPU is too old.
Larry / W1DYJ
On 5/1/2025 11:22, Greg Walls via wsjt-devel wrote:
As a former IT Professional of 32 years, why would anyone be on an
unsupported platform, especially when upgrades to Windows 11 are free?
I wonder if these guys are
Keep in mind that 160 is dead right now due to the sun cycle. 160 is
always dead during the day.
Larry / W1DYJ
On 12/7/2023 10:46, Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hello,
FT8 on 160m pales.
WSJT-X operators customarily running FT8 and FT4 on 80m through 10m HF
bands are likely disap
Hi Glen,
I have my TX watchdog set to 3 minutes. I just let it time out to check
my frequency.
Larry / W1DYJ
On 4/27/2023 12:00, Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel wrote:
Good Day,
FT8/4 enhancement suggestion follows.
(I know that stable code can be broken by side effects and "better is
the
It's a false positive. Turn off you spam-blocker temporarily or better,
add it to your allowed list.
73 -- Larry -- W1DYJ
On 11/14/2022 14:29, hansenc--- via wsjt-devel wrote:
I tried to download wsjtx-2.1.0-win64.exe and I got a message that it
can't be downloaded securely. How do I downlo
Hi Saku,
It is much easier to use a proper contest logging program. There are
many out there. I use the programs from N3FJP -- they are easy to set
up and use. They do everything you need.
Larry / W1DYJ
On 10/14/2022 4:29, Saku via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi!
Sorry if this feature exist. I di
If they don't get your RR73, then they will send back their R-#. IF you
get nothing back they got your R73 and are playing by the rules.
Larry / W1DYJ
On 7/15/2022 1:29, Adrian via wsjt-devel wrote:
When you send a RR73 and get nothing back, then wsjtx has logged the
call, but you don't
They came back to me with a signal report three times, but then someone else in
FN42 jumped on top of my frequency with more power and the Q never could
complete. This may be what is happening to you. Lots of hams calling, and not
necessarily looking for an open frequency.
73 -- Larry -- W1D
I just worked then with one call -- they have multiple signals a bit apart
from each other, but working them is not difficult. Just use normal FT8
protocols.
73 -- Larry -- W1DYJ
[in Maine]
-Original Message-
From: Gary McDuffie
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 18:25
To: WSJT soft
Hi Chris,
Even if you double-clicked, he/she would have to chose which ham to go back to
of the many calling on frequency. I see this many times, especially with DX.
I do find it *usually* more successful to call the DX split.
73 -- Larry -- W1DYJ
From: Hasan al-Basri
Sent: Monday, Dec
Hi Bill,
Be sure to download the EXACT version number. I first downloaded a later
version and it did not work.
73 -- Larry -- W1DYJ
From: Bill Somerville
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2018 19:12
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] File not found SSL/TLS WSJT-X 2.0
Hi Bill,
I was going to say the /ME was not illegal, especially with the space: W1DYJ
/ME. In fact, as mentioned I have been using this for a year now from my
Maine QTH and it has been helpful, as FN43 is not specific to Maine. 1.9.1
did not filter any free form messages as far as I could te
Hi,
I have just switched to 2.0 RC5. I use it mainly for HF/FT8.
With FT8 and when at my 2nd home in Maine, I usually change my TX6 -- the
autoloaded CQ W1DYJ FN43 -- to CQ W1DYJ /ME as Maine is far more important info
than just FN43 (v1.9.1). NOW, it won’t take the /ME (v2.0 RC5). When I tr
13 matches
Mail list logo
