The way the different contest exchanges are implemented in WSJT is
confusing and has been discussed many times.
Users has to select "EU VHF" if they are in a HF contest requiring either a
serial number and/or the full 6-digit locator. Trying to use a particular
contest exchange may resulting in a
Fred, there were many 3Y0J pirates on, maybe you worked one of them?
73, Palle, OZ1RH.
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:15:14 -0300
> From: Fred Carvalho
> To: WSJT software development , Joe
> Taylor
> Subject: [wsjt-devel] 3Y0J strange F/H operation
> Message-ID:
>
During this past weekend I operated OZ9EDR/P in a HF contest where a 4
digit serial number was to be exchanged. In order to let FT8 transmit this
serial number I had to set WSJT Version 2.2.2 up for 'EU VHF contest'. I
noticed that almost all stations I called answered, but the QSO's never
Claude, at present this is not unwanted switching to EU VHF mode, but the
naming or wording of what is happening is misleading.
The situation seems to be that you work a station that is in a contest
requiring an exchange of a serial number and/or the full locator (a 6-digit
locator). In order to
uot;. My received exchange was almost every time filled in on
the "Invalid QSO Data' window as is should.
73, Palle, OZ1RH
www.oz1rh.com www.kh8.oz0j.dk
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 12:13 AM Palle Preben-Hansen, OZ1RH
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> People are using EU VHF if they ar
Same problem here, after the first 2-3 QSO's were logged the small error
logging window from WSJT-X popped up with an error about invalid QSO data
as my send rpt+exchange did not appear in the QSO data to be saved. Almost
every QSO thereafter I had to enter my send report and state/serial nr to
Hi,
People are using EU VHF if they are in a contest requiring either a serial
number and/or the full 6-digit locator. This is required in the major VHF
contests in Europe. Many contests on HF also requires a serial number, so
this feature applies to more than just EU VHF.
I suggest the labeling
ur Region 1 contest exchanges? Do you
> think FT8 might be a popular mode for some use in EU VHF+ contests?
>
> -- 73, Joe, K1JT
>
> On 6/30/2017 7:37 PM, Palle Preben-Hansen, OZ1RH wrote:
>
>> FT8 sounds promising. Joe wrote:
>> /Three extra bits are available in the mess
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:16:39 -0400
From: Ray Jacobs
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Ft 8 in Exhibition Mode
Message-ID: <1624aa2adf3-c88-c...@webjas-vae058.srv.aolmail.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
You were right they were
The two reflection areas called hot A and B is also in my old article i
UKSMG Six News: www.uksmg.org/content/deadband.htm
73, Palle, OZ1RH.
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 22:15:14 -0500
From: "Bill Lewis"
To: "'WSJT software development'"
d be the FT8 S/N
> reading mapped onto a S1 to S9 scale, using 6 dB per S unit. Something like
> S1=-24, S2=-18, ... S9=+24 dB.
>
> Is this an acceptable format for your Region 1 contest exchanges? Do you
> think FT8 might be a popular mode for some use in EU VHF+ contests?
>
>
FT8 sounds promising. Joe wrote:
*Three extra bits are available in the message payload, with uses yet to
be **defined. We have in mind special message formats that might be used
in **contests, and the like. Your considered suggestions for use of these
bits **are very welcome!*
1. VHF
12 matches
Mail list logo