[wsjt-devel] Auto sequence shouldn't stop after other op sends 73 to a different call...

2017-09-15 Thread Ross Primrose
Having TX no longer enabled when someone comes back to a call other than your own is a great thing, but I don't think it should disable TX after a 73 sent to another call.  I  typically enable TX when I expect the CQing station to be sending 73 so I can transmit the full 15sec in the normally d

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and "Call 1st"

2017-07-12 Thread Ross Primrose
u get ready to click, as for the missed period ... ? I joked to a few people about this way back when FT8 was introduced, but jeez people ... its only 15 seconds ... Neil, KN3ILZ On 7/12/2017 10:28 AM, Ross Primrose wrote: You must have faster wetware than I do... It's next to impossible t

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and "Call 1st"

2017-07-12 Thread Ross Primrose
haver (N2ADV) wrote: That's built into the wetware (brain matter) of the person controlling the program :) On Jul 11, 2017, at 10:22 PM, Ross Primrose wrote: One feature I'd like to see is if you answer a CQ, and the station comes back to someone else, halt tx... 73, Ross N4RP On 07/1

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and "Call 1st"

2017-07-11 Thread Ross Primrose
One feature I'd like to see is if you answer a CQ, and the station comes back to someone else, halt tx... 73, Ross N4RP On 07/11/2017 07:23 PM, Ricky Scott W7PSK wrote: As Jim said, its a nice AID to us old timers that cant click the red in 1 second -- Original Message -- From: "Jim

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 + Autoseq + Free Text TX5

2017-07-10 Thread Ross Primrose
Should being the key word. I was working with another local ham last night, I was running 7833, he was 78 20somthing. I sent a TX5 that was "5W 160L TU 73" when he would have been expecting a generated 73 and his end didn't trigger the 73, he just kept sending the auto-generated RRR... 73, R