Well you are wrong. As it is released it doesn’t have that ability. If
someone byte bangs some hack to make it so then your skewed theory would
make just about any ham radio software “illegal.”
Ryan, N2YQT
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 9:19 PM Neil Zampella wrote:
> By the software being 'illegal' I
It’s short sighted attempts to blat. Packet, APRS, the Winlink modes, all
auto sequence after a connection is initiated. There really is no
difference.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 1:53 PM Jim Shorney wrote:
>
> Rules pertaining to Automatic Operation can be found in Part 97 sections:
>
> 97.3(6)
> 9
A bit prissy to exclude a station that lacks a signal report. You both
ack'd each other. obviously the call took place.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 6:53 AM Fred Price wrote:
>
> Ed,
>
> You do know that if you are using LoTW to confirm your QSO's then all that is
> needed for a valid QSO is:
> Excha
6M is a fickle beast.
On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 12:41 PM Edward stallman wrote:
> I worked a new one JW7QIA Peter on 6m and was on the ON4KST 6m chat at the
> time . When the QSO was complete I Thanked Peter and pasted his final FT8
> 73 on the chat page . I don't understand the difference we each
ll not even run/function during
> the June VHF contest or Field Day.
>
> So, hope to see you on FT8 - should be really interesting if this weekends
> VHF contest is any indicator.
>
> John
>
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 10:53 AM Ryan Tourge wrote:
>
>> So with all the
I have used the following method regardless of radio used...
Use an external power meter (after the transmitter).
Adjust audio gain/drive until the point where power meter stops rising. At
this point, the radios ALC meter will start to show some deflection. Back
the audio back slightly. The power
So with all the updating and stuff what is going to be the preferred mode
and method for field day?
Asking for a friend...
Ryan, N2YQT
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
I finally had to move to another offset.
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Ryan Tourge"
> To: "Scotty W7PSK" ; "WSJT software development" <
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: 4/18/2019 9:21:27 AM
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel
Not everyone can receive everyone else. He mostly called CQ there because
he didn't hear you. This is basic radio propagation fundamental.
Ryan, N2YQT
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:13 PM Scotty W7PSK wrote:
> I was on the air just now when a Jerk just started CQing dead on top of
> me. I was in th
Yous should have chokes (even snap-ons will help) on the cabling between
the radio and the computer. In my case, I have these big square
snap-ons and then the excess cable is coiled up through a toroid. Common
mode will always find the path of least resistance.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 8:28 AM Lest
Good info! Thanks! I'm doing something similar and although It didn't
affect WSJT-X it did cause issues with my loggin software trying to do
lookups.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 1:04 AM Mike Lewis wrote:
> You have probably seen my earlier posts tracking down the cause of lost
> decode cycles, or mo
The signal strength report you received from the other station.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:01 PM Al wrote:
> When not in contest mode, what does the rcvd field signify on the log form
> ?
>
>
> AL, K0VM
> ___
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists
Oh disregard I just noticed the bottom right Recd box.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:05 PM Ryan Tourge wrote:
> The signal strength report you received from the other station.
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:01 PM Al wrote:
>
>> When not in contest mode, what does the rcvd field
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 7:41 AM Stephen Ireland wrote:
> Folks,
>
>
>
> I realise that Joe K1JT has recommended that for 2.0 RC4 that we should be
> transmitting above 2000hz in offset.
>
> Many of us have radios (i.e. non-SDR’s such as Yaesu’s and Pre-SDR-based
> Icom’s) that have known “perform
You can participate. Leave your station on so it captures the fun. Analyze
the action when you are done.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:50 AM Tom Ramberg via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> It would be fun, but the wrong time of the day. 0400-0500 local time here,
> the gravey
x27;s are installed.
>
> Best regards and RR73 9A5CW
>
> Datuma pon, 19. stu 2018. 15:21 Ryan Tourge
>> I suspect a large population is using one of the mutants (JTDX etc.) and
>> probably don't even know about any of this. That said... I have used both
>> and WSJT
I suspect a large population is using one of the mutants (JTDX etc.) and
probably don't even know about any of this. That said... I have used both
and WSJT-X pretty much offers everything now that I looked for in JTDX.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 3:34 AM dgb wrote:
> Amen
>
> I tried RC4 for the
Obviously narrowing the amount of "noise" you are passing to the software
will make the S/N ratio appear better. As Mr. Taylor pointed out the
software is assuming you have set the bandwidth up as directed and bases
the readings on that assumption.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:23 AM George J. Molnar
I took bagged EA8DBM. Across the pond with an M2 halo clone I made for $25.
I got Mexico a little before that and thought that was exciting. I didn't
expect the Canary Islands to happen but he answered on my third CQ.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:21 AM Michael Aust wrote:
> Worked EA8DBM off the We
I'm going to go against the flow and say yes I would like a field day
option.
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 1:07 PM, Gary McDuffie wrote:
>
>
> > On May 10, 2018, at 9:22 AM, George Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Since FD, in particular, is a training event, maybe we shouldn’t
> encourage semi-automated conta
If you could force my FT-857D to comply with CAT control I would be all for
it HIHI
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Yup...sure ishopefully that will stop 99% of them (except the ones who
> manually dial in the rig).
> E
e County Amateur Radio Service (PCARS)
> ARRL A-1 Op
>
> On May 8, 2018, at 8:48 AM, Ryan Tourge wrote:
>
> Last night 6M and 10M were open from my QTH in Upstate NY to Florida. Most
> signals were well over 0dB. I had a heck of time with exactly what you
> showed. It was a delicate
(PCARS)
> ARRL A-1 Op
>
> On May 8, 2018, at 7:36 AM, Ryan Tourge wrote:
>
> His +5 signal is ringing producing those "harmonics." If you turn the rf
> gain down a bit it will stop.
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Gene Marsh wrote:
>
>> H
&
His +5 signal is ringing producing those "harmonics." If you turn the rf
gain down a bit it will stop.
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Gene Marsh wrote:
> H
>
> - that was the first time for that spacing
> - this was the first time for my new Signlink USB (it includes sound
> card). The
NBEMS?
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 17:10 Earle wrote:
> Brilliant idea!
>
> Earle KM4ISN
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 17, 2018, at 3:57 PM, Paul Dukette wrote:
>
> These are unsettling times. This week the US Government announced to the
> public that our infrastructure in very vulnerable to
Did you delete the adi file that contains the log of the stations you have
worked?
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 6:37 AM, Bill Somerville
wrote:
> On 25/12/2017 14:09, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
>
>> WSJT-X needs cty.dat to be able do DXCC tracking. It guesses the country
>> from the prefix.
It's my understanding that when FT8 is implemented you can upload as FT8
and it will then confirm FT8 QSOs and unconfirm the DATA QSOs. I might be
wrong.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Greg Beam wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
>
>
> Thanks. I recall--vaguely--there being some issue with using this method
Ugh now you tell me :D
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Bill Somerville
wrote:
> On 13/07/2017 17:52, jarmo wrote:
>
> Hi OM,
>
> upgraded. The next RC will be compatible with Fedora 26. Please have
> some sympathy for the development team who have to maintain multiple
> platforms to test and d
Well I've tried everything I can think of. And what you fellas could think
of, and what Facebook could think of. I'm missing something. I'll wait for
the RC.
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Lloyd Kirk wrote:
> You need libusb-1.0.0 and the -devel package I suspect.
>
> Had a similar issue with
I'm having trouble compiling WSJT-X. I've installed the SDK and I believe
all the dependencies that it has yelled at me about. It appears to have
built hamlib-3 fine but when I try to build the latest development branch
it gives me the following:
This is on an Ubuntu 16.04 32 Bit system:
/home/r
Don't say never... I had four states that I thought the same thing about
and one night I got three of them in a row on JT9.
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Claude Frantz <
claude.fra...@bayern-mail.de> wrote:
> On 04/11/2017 02:16 PM, Black Michael wrote:
>
> > In the U.S. it's explicitly legal
That fixed it? I was having the same problem.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Richard Bown wrote:
> qtmultimedia5-dev and libqt5serialport5-dev
>
> missing sorry for the bandwidth
>
>
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:47:47 +
> Richard Bown wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > like to try RC3, but hitting a problem
32 matches
Mail list logo
