Re: [wsjt-devel] NIL RC4 activity in EU?

2018-11-15 Thread Scott Davis
I interpreted Tom R's message to mean that when he decoded a transmission from YO6BLM, he attempted to contact YO6BLM, but the other operator did not hear him. Al, I wonder whether you can express yourself as well in Swedish or Finnish as Tom expresses himself in English. This snarky, cranky li

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.0.0-rc4 FT8 bugs

2018-11-14 Thread Scott Davis
Hi Bill, Thank you for clearing that up for me! 73 Scott W6SDD > On Nov 14, 2018, at 11:38, Bill Somerville wrote: > > Hi Scott, > > there is a facility in WSJT-X to send RR73 as a final QSO message rather than > RRR, it is intended to be used when you are almost certain that it will be >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Enhancement request

2018-04-25 Thread Scott Davis
I'd like to support Dwight's comment again. How well the FT8 receive marker stands out is a fine point for sure. But I think there are good reasons to want to find it quickly. Sometimes it happens that another operator and I have a contact going, and he has sent me a good signal report -- let

Re: [wsjt-devel] Enhancement request

2018-04-25 Thread Scott Davis
For me, too, the green receive marker is harder to see than the red transmit marker. Maybe it would stand out better if it were dark green, blue-green, or blue. Scott W6SDD > On Apr 25, 2018, at 13:06, dgb wrote: > > I'm finding the little green marker for receiving to be too small, especia

[wsjt-devel] possible bugs in WSJT-X 1.9.0-rc3

2018-04-05 Thread Scott Davis
8EF 73 041415 -18 0.3 1433 ~ W6SDD KK4EUN RRR <<-- (C) 041432 Tx 2228 ~ KK4EUN W6SDD R-18 <<-- (D) 041500 Tx 2228 ~ KK4EUN W6SDD 73 I hope this is helpful. Best regards, Scott Davis W6SDD --