Too bad many of them don't run JTAlert or have texting not set to on!
;-) ... or don't have an email on QRZ!
73 Dwight NS9I
On 7/28/2019 11:01 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
Attribute it to inexperienceyou should contact them and help to
politely educate them.
Something like:
H
If it's a new call I haven't worked, my logger automatically looks the
call in qrz or if it's previously worked, it grabs it from the old log
entry. What logger are you using, mine is DXLabs?
73 Dwight NS9I
On 4/13/2019 9:13 AM, DX Jami via wsjt-devel wrote:
Dick,
Agree with you Dick. It is
70 q's and all is well ... amazed at the activity, including DX on all
the bands.
T U Team
73 Dwight NS9i
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
If one wishes, you can change the default power level. I WSJT-x File,
Open Log Directory, you will find a file named WSJT-X.ini. Close WSJT-X
and edit that file and do a ctrl F for TxPower= and change it to what
you want.
Of course when and if you change power level again you'll have to go
th
In the new v2.0, the power level isn't being retained with the box
checked, in the logging window. Running WIN 10 with JTA.
Tnx for the great work of the team!
73 Dwight NS9I
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lis
Amen
I tried RC4 for the last hr. with CQ's on 160-30 and got many replies
but not one using RC4!!
Apparently a very small part of the population using RC4.
What's it going take to get them to change their ways? ;-)
73 Dwight NS9I
On 11/17/2018 4:01 AM, Krzysztof Krzemiński wrote:
Lad
Someone asked if one renamed an audio device, how do you get WSJT-X to
recognize it.
Where does WSJT-X look for those devices?
I have replaced them in wsjt-x's .ini file but that don't help.
I can find the change of the names in the Registry.
Thanks 73 Dwight NS9I
--
Only to those that don't take the little time to see how they work!
On 7/3/2018 10:38 AM, Al Pawlowski wrote:
If a count was taken, I bet it would be 10 to 1 or more that think the
button arrows are backwards.
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:08:57 +0100
From: Barry Smith
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sou
Yes Mike ... great improvement - 1524749489046blob.jpg - has my vote.
thank you 73 Dwight NS9I
On 4/26/2018 8:34 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
Yellow doesn't show up worth a hoot.
But perhaps changing the goal posts a bit might help?
One option...when they match you see this (could
r. [I haven't tested that objectively
- it's just my subjective opinion.]
The red TX marker, on the other hand, does need to be placed manually on the
right spot. So it is good that the red marker stands out visually.
73,
Gary ZL2iFB
-Original Message-
From: dgb
I'm finding the little green marker for receiving to be too small,
especially when the waterfall is full of signals. It don't stick out
like the red marker. As seconds are critical, spending a second or two
to find it can be critical. Would it be possible to increase it's
height, like X2?
tha
While I'm not running the same hardware, and running win 10, I've had
the same two things happen to me several times. In addition I've had
Halt Tx not halt.
tnx 73 Dwight NS9I
On 4/5/2018 1:37 AM, Scott Davis wrote:
Hi.
I just joined this list. I'm enjoying using FT8 on HF bands. Many tha
. Perhaps both sides have to be
using versions that have it implemented?
In selecting RR73 for TX4 in Panel 1, my TX5 (CQ DX EI4KF) gets
over-written by ab1cde EI4KF 73.
In Panel 2, which I use, double-clicking the TX4 equivalent (RRR)
doesn’t change it to RR73.
Erik EI4KF.
*From:*dgb [mailto:n
Yes same here on r7959 - T U 73 Dwight NS9I
On 7/27/2017 4:01 AM, Wolfgang wrote:
Hello Dwight,
r7959 - same here.
But Bill mentioned in a message that they working on it.
73 de Wolfgang
OE1MWW
Thursday, July 27, 2017, 10:52:05 AM, you wrote:
Hi Wolfgang - how has that worked out for you
Hi Wolfgang - how has that worked out for you? When I tried it on r7956
everybody just kept coming back to me with a repeat of the signal report
... it wasn't decoding correctly at the other end. Trying r7959 now.
73 Dwight NS9I
On 7/27/2017 3:35 AM, Wolfgang wrote:
Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v
I just updated and thank you for the RR73 option.
The first 5 qso's I tried that on, from those answering my CQ, they all
came back to me with a repeat of the signal report.
Could it be that the Autoseq isn't reacting right on their end when rcvg
RR73 ?
73 Dwight NS9I
... and that is a wonderful trick Bill
tnx 73 Dwight NS9I
On 7/24/2017 3:51 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 24/07/2017 21:38, Neil Zampella wrote:
don't know if this has anything to do with the latest changes in
r7939, but when I press F4 to clear the DX data, the Tab 1 messages
clear except f
Same thing has happened here numerous times over numerous versions. I
found by shutting off the Automatic system I'm able to from a macro
insert a 73 message. Of course, all this takes time, after the other
station has sent RRR - pia at any rate.
73 Dwight NS9I
On 7/24/2017 9:54 AM, Ed Wilso
Very good idea Bill!
tnx 73 Dwight NS9I
On 7/21/2017 5:09 AM, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 21/07/2017 10:49, R Edward wrote:
In JT65/JT9, I often will try to find a clear transmit frequency, and
by turning off TX/RX lock, work other stations split-frequency.
In the hectic waterfall of FT8, tha
Mike, how does one add those patches?
73 Dwight NS9I
On 7/19/2017 1:01 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
Make main window water fall slider optional in Settings/General. Add
in-your-face notice to audio settings. Improve Transceiver Setup in
manual. Improve tooltip on inGain slider.
When xmtg the HALT button don't stop transmission
73 Dwight NS9I
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Same here - everytime.
73 Dwight NS9I
On 7/17/2017 9:57 PM, Neil Zampella wrote:
Meant Rx frequency window .. :(
On 7/17/2017 10:45 PM, Neil Zampella wrote:
V1.7.1-r7925 ... double entries in Tx window when replying via Auto
Sequence.
Neil, KN3ILZ
-
when answering qso's the TX5 line comes up blank - no 73 ... why?
73 Dwight NS9I
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
ck so need to see what's happening.
de Mike W9MDB
----
*From:* dgb
*To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Sent:* Saturday, July 15, 2017 9:45 AM
*Subject:* Re: [wsjt-devel] r7891 Issue
I am also seeing this happen.
73 D
haven't been able to get it to drop the 73 out of 30 q's
73 Dwight NS9I
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
I am also seeing this happen.
73 Dwight NS9I
On 7/15/2017 7:14 AM, Ed Wilson via wsjt-devel wrote:
Dear Developers,
I was testing r7891 this morning on FT8 mode. I noticed that the "73"
line in the standard messages sometimes came-up blank when I
double-clicked a call sign to attempt a QSO.
sri RRR
On 7/10/2017 10:21 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
This link removed since Joe just fixed it.
de Mike W9MDB
*From:* Black Michael via wsjt-devel
*To:* WSJT software development
*Cc:* Black Michael
*S
From Dropbox
That file isn’t here anymore
Someone might’ve deleted the file or disabled the link.
On 7/10/2017 10:15 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
Try this patchhave to test to ensure it doesn't hose all the other
modes but it fixes the JT65/JT9 problem and appears to me to be t
First of all tnx to all the developers for the continuing great sftwe.
I was having problems compiling new version and this morning Mike W9MDB
offered to connect with me via Teamviewer to find the problems.
He solved them quickly and in addition, tweaked many other things, and
explained them
29 matches
Mail list logo
