Re: [wsjt-devel] MSK144 & FT8

2024-03-11 Thread k2txb--- via wsjt-devel
I have to disagree. I do not like that the report does not change, during the QSO, when the received strength changes. For example, I call CQ on 144 FT8. I am beaming West. A station from the Northeast calls me. I receive his call at -20 dB. I immediately start rotating my antenna to point t

Re: [wsjt-devel] Truncated Waterfall Display "Feature"

2023-04-07 Thread k2txb--- via wsjt-devel
e of 200 - 2600 with bin/pixel set at 2, just increase it to 3 or higher as needed. 73, Sam W2JDB -Original Message----- From: k2txb--- via wsjt-devel mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > To: 'Black Michael' mailto:mdblac...@yahoo.com> >; 'WSJ

Re: [wsjt-devel] Truncated Waterfall Display "Feature"

2023-04-05 Thread k2txb--- via wsjt-devel
the low end set to 200 Hz, it shows me everything up to 2600 Hz. That is almost always sufficient. Don’t see any advantage to asking for a default setting greater than that. Russ K2TXB From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 12:47 PM To: k2txb--- via wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Truncated Waterfall Display "Feature"

2023-04-05 Thread k2txb--- via wsjt-devel
Dwane, I am almost certain that your assumption in incorrect. For WSJT in general, it does not matter what the settings for the waterfall display are set to. They have nothing to do with decoding, they provide only visual signal recognition. So, if there is a decodable signal above the 1500 H