Today I attempted to TX using WSPR and learned that my callsign (VK6FLAB)
which I've held for nearly a decade isn't considered a "standard" callsign
- this format was introduced in 2005.
According to the ITU[1], my callsign is a perfectly legal callsign (and has
been since 2003) (*emphasis* mine):
Hi Onno,
I was enquiring about this in February this year too -
https://sourceforge.net/p/wsjt/mailman/message/36929030/
> With various tests, I can hear my WSPR transmissions away from my station
and WSJT-X can even decode my transmissions. However the decoding only
occurs on transmissions where
Onno,
There is nothing wrong with your call sign of four characters in the
suffix. It is just too long to fit within the restrictions of WSJT-X if you
want to use WSJT-X in the standard way. Mind you, you can still use
WSJT-X, just not in the standard way.
WSJT-X was never created to work smoothl
Frankly that makes no sense.
All the JT modes have evolved over time. Even WSPR has evolved. Compound
callsigns were introduced with WSPR 2.00 (r1714) Nov 19, 2009 -
http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSPR_Changelog.TXT
Just because it wasn't designed with a four character suffix callsign i
Hi Onno,
On 6/19/2020 3:53 PM, Onno Benschop VK6FLAB wrote:
Frankly that makes no sense.
All the JT modes have evolved over time. Even WSPR has evolved. Compound
callsigns were introduced with WSPR 2.00 (r1714) Nov 19, 2009 -
http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSPR_Changelog.TXT
Just
