Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP

2014-08-17 Thread KI7MT
per cycle. > > Hope this helps & 73 > Bill > G4WJS. >> >> >> -----Original Message- >> From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com] >> Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 5:13 PM >> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: Re: [w

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP

2014-08-16 Thread Bill Somerville
pe this helps & 73 Bill G4WJS. > > > -Original Message- > From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com] > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 5:13 PM > To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP > > On 16/08/2014 22:59, Michael

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP

2014-08-16 Thread Michael Black
ll Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com] > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 4:43 PM > To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP > > On 16/08/2014 22:28, Michael Black wrote: > Hii Mike, >> Looks like I got a trace log after the segfault

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP

2014-08-16 Thread Bill Somerville
g4...@classdesign.com] > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 4:43 PM > To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP > > On 16/08/2014 22:28, Michael Black wrote: > Hii Mike, >> Looks like I got a trace log after the segfault anyways. > OK, the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP

2014-08-16 Thread Michael Black
eforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP On 16/08/2014 22:28, Michael Black wrote: Hii Mike, > Looks like I got a trace log after the segfault anyways. OK, the seg fault is probably as a result of a defect which is a consequence of not coping well with the following: It doesn't look

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP

2014-08-16 Thread Michael Black
Range = 0..1 ?N N -Original Message- From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com] Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 4:43 PM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP On 16/08/2014 22:28,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP

2014-08-16 Thread Bill Somerville
ebug: > HRDTransceiver::send_command: reply byte count: 60 > Sat Aug 16 21:15:37 2014 > GMT(D:\JTSDK-QT\src\wsjtx\HRDTransceiver.cpp:757)Debug: > HRDTransceiver::send_command( "get radio" ): -> "TT-OMNI VII (Radio)" > Sat Aug 16 21:15:37 2014 > GMT(D:\JTSDK-QT\src\w

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP

2014-08-16 Thread Michael Black
("2850 Hz", "2700 Hz", "2550 Hz", "2400 Hz", "2250 Hz", "2100 Hz", "1950 Hz", "1800 Hz", "1650 Hz", "1500 Hz", "1350 Hz", "1200 Hz") ) ( "Mode A" , ("AM", "

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP

2014-08-16 Thread Bill Somerville
y, August 16, 2014 1:50 PM > To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP > > On 16/08/2014 19:00, Michael Black wrote: > Hi Michael, >> Using WSJT-X 1.40 as of 7/30/14 >> >> Bug: >> HRD cat control doesn't not work over T

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP

2014-08-16 Thread Michael Black
STALLD%/%OPTION% %SRCD%/%APP_NAME% -Original Message- From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com] Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 1:50 PM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP On 16/08/2014 19:00, Michael Black wrote: Hi Michael, > Using W

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP

2014-08-16 Thread Bill Somerville
On 16/08/2014 19:00, Michael Black wrote: Hi Michael, > Using WSJT-X 1.40 as of 7/30/14 > > Bug: > HRD cat control doesn't not work over TCP/IP to port 7809 on HRD 6.2.7.285 > (also on previous release that I had) > I assume I'm setting it up correctly with 127.0.0.1:7809 and also tried with > the

[wsjt-devel] Bug in HRD TCP

2014-08-16 Thread Michael Black
Using WSJT-X 1.40 as of 7/30/14 Bug: HRD cat control doesn't not work over TCP/IP to port 7809 on HRD 6.2.7.285 (also on previous release that I had) I assume I'm setting it up correctly with 127.0.0.1:7809 and also tried with the setting empty. I get "Ham Radio Deluxe didn't respond as expected".