Hi,
On 08/20/2017 02:20 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
Ned, AA7A, made a seemingly good point about needing handy use of
function keys for controlling progress of a QSO. DXped ops "never use a
mouse", etc., etc. With a multi-decoding system like FT8 likely
producing decodes from 30 or more eager calle
AM
To: WSJT
Subject: [wsjt-devel] DXpeditions - FT8, Split or not to split
DXpeditions - FT8, Split or not to split
Having a great amount of success DXing on HF (363 countries, 7 band triple
DXCC, HR, etc) running low power, and
having already worked
ion easily with the mouse.
Steve
VK6IR
-Original Message-
From: Alex, VE3NEA
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 10:11 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] DXpeditions - FT8, Split or not to split
good point about needing handy use of function keys for controlling
good point about needing handy use of function keys for controlling progress of a QSO. DXped ops
"never use a mouse", etc., etc. With a multi-decoding system like FT8 likely producing decodes from 30 or more eager callers,
how are we to choose one of them with function keys?
A DX operator a
Hi Rich and all,
On 8/19/2017 2:15 PM, Rich - K1HTV wrote:
DXpeditions - FT8, Split or not to split
Thanks for sharing your ideas on this topic.
We (the WSJT developers, that is) will be happy to offer advice, when/if
asked. But I don't consider it our task to tell the DXpedition crew
what
DXpeditions - FT8, Split or not to split
Having a great amount of success DXing on HF (363 countries, 7 band triple
DXCC, HR, etc) running low power, and
having already worked over 2800 QSOs in 117 DXCC countries on FT8 with 50-75
Watts, I believe that I
