Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 on 222 MHz and an aircraft scatter / Doppler shift observation

2018-09-26 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Mark, Thanks for your reply. The "/R" usage is intended for NA VHF contest messages only. You can't "mix and match" with the special message formats. Thus, you can't use a "/R" callsign in (say) the special RTTY Roundup message formats. See the example QSOs in the "Quick-Start Guide to

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 on 222 MHz and an aircraft scatter / Doppler shift observation

2018-09-26 Thread Mark Spencer
Hi Joe. I am pondering running during the HF test tonight but also saw your message about avoiding the use of a "non standard or compound call". Would running tonight with a "/R" call be ok ? (I'm not 100 percent certain I can be on the air tonight but will try hard (: My home HF station i

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 on 222 MHz and an aircraft scatter / Doppler shift observation

2018-09-26 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Mark, Thanks for your interesting report on using FT8 at 222 MHz. Also important: we're waiting to hear from you about the "/R" (rover) capabilities in WSJT-X 2.0. This facility is there because you (and others) asked for it. We would appreciate your feedback. -- 73, Joe, K1JT

[wsjt-devel] FT8 on 222 MHz and an aircraft scatter / Doppler shift observation

2018-09-26 Thread Mark Spencer
Hi: In case anyone is interested. There was a reasonable amount of activity yesterday in the pacific north West on 222 MHz FT8 during the 222 MHz sprint. My FT736 appears to be more than stable enough for FT8 use on that band. At one point I was getting two decodes on two audio frequencie