deleted, is only â¬S73,⬠which is a
>nice pleasantry, but not a confirmation of anything, and slows down the QSO
>rate by 50%, 90 seconds per QSO vs. 60 seconds per QSO.
>Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
>Yuma, AZ
>From: Saku
>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 8:21 AM
>To: Dave Ha
WSJT software development ; wsjt-x development Reflector
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Faster contest sequence
Hi!
Maybe because of this.
https://www.google.fi/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://hf.r-e-f.org/c4_iaru_r1/10vienne/VIE10_C4_11%2520QSO%2520d
Hi Dave,
There are still some Ops out there that simply don't read. What can I
say? I agree with you RR73 should be answered by a 73 and the QSO is
complete. Although I have had many QSOs in which the other Op either
didn't send a final 73 or I didn't copy it. That brings me to the next
questio
Hi!
Maybe because of this.
https://www.google.fi/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://hf.r-e-f.org/c4_iaru_r1/10vienne/VIE10_C4_11%2520QSO%2520definition.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiEko_F4eXeAhUCBiwKHU6VBOIQFjAAegQIABAB&usg=AOvVaw0V-30uPteK4he8PsRKJC6r
"Conclusion. 1c" at the end of document is read so tha
On 11/20/2018 10:54 AM, Dave Hachadorian wrote:
It worked OK sometimes, but several callers kept coming back for more
info, apparently looking for that final (TX5) “73” from me.
That's partly because some FT8 operators don't have contesting
experience. The sequence you outline is perfectly rig
I tried using the following sequence in the contest last night.
I SEND (TX6) CQ RU K6LL DM22
SHE SENDS (TX2) K6LL K7ABC 569 AZ
I SEND (TX3) K7ABC K6LL R 579 AZ
SHE SENDS (TX4) K6LL K7ABC RR73
I SEND (TX6) CQ RU K6LL DM22
It worked OK sometimes, but several callers kept coming back for mor
