Hi Mike and all,
W9MDB wrote:
> #2 To prevent what happened to me...where I blew out the finals on my
> rig when I was operating remotely on 15M because the SWR was too high
> and so was the power level from WSJT-X. Unfortunately rig wasn't smart
> enough to curb power (it's in the shop now). I ha
Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 2:59 PM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Fw: Power memory patch
Mike --
Could you explain the rationale behind this suggested feature?
Why might I want WSJT-X to remember particular power output settings on
a band-by-band basis?
OK Mike -- Revision 7230 now includes your patch implementing
save/restore of Pwr settings. Thanks!
-- Joe, K1JT
--
The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers
Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Fw: Power memory patch
Mike --
Could you explain the rationale behind this suggested feature?
Why might I want WSJT-X to remember particular power output settings on
a band-by-band basis?
Why would I (in general) want to
Mike --
Could you explain the rationale behind this suggested feature?
Why might I want WSJT-X to remember particular power output settings on
a band-by-band basis?
Why would I (in general) want to adjust my power output by using the
slider on the WSJT-X screen, rather than by making an adjust
Figured out the problem with new-features.adoc was on my side for some odd
reason.
Minor patch for that fileIndex: new_features.adoc
===---
new_features.adoc (revision 7227)+++ new_features.adoc (working copy)@@
-25,3 +25,5 @@
