Gi Bill,
On 09/29/2014 07:46 AM, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 29/09/2014 14:40, Richard Shaw wrote:
Hi Richard,
Perhaps changing it to "pre" for pre-release would be better?
There is already an "is release" flag in Versions.cmake that could be
used to do that, when I get a chance I'll make that h
Perhaps changing it to "pre" for pre-release would be better?
Thanks,
Richard
--
Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
On 29/09/2014 14:40, Richard Shaw wrote:
Hi Richard,
> Perhaps changing it to "pre" for pre-release would be better?
There is already an "is release" flag in Versions.cmake that could be
used to do that, when I get a chance I'll make that happen. My
preference is something like "-dev" or "-devel"
On 29/09/2014 14:18, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
The head version 1.5 is calling itself "rc1". Is that intentional?
It was, it is debatable whether it is a release candidate yet but if I
switch that off, as it stands, it will become v1.5.0 which is even less
accurate.
Mike W9MDB
73
Bil
The head version 1.5 is calling itself "rc1". Is that intentional?
Mike W9MDB
--
Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
