On 14/06/2015 12:55, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
> Yeah...I had a "duh" moment this morning when I woke up...wrote that thing
> last night when I was tired.
> I didn't had forgotten about the random_shuffle function...thanks for the
> reminder.
> That makes the function look like this then:
>
>
Yeah...I had a "duh" moment this morning when I woke up...wrote that thing
last night when I was tired.
I didn't had forgotten about the random_shuffle function...thanks for the
reminder.
That makes the function look like this then:
auto next_band(int num_bands, bool reset)
{
static int sa
On 14/06/2015 04:55, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
> Would it be good/better if the next hop choice was random order amongst your
> bands instead of just a continuously random band?
Probably although that is not random since the probability of a band
being chosen increases with time since it was
Would it be good/better if the next hop choice was random order amongst your
bands instead of just a continuously random band?
This way you'd be guaranteed to visit each band in an N-transmit * N-bands
period instead of Las Vegas odds where you can get bad runs and never touch
a band for quite a wh
