Re: [wsjt-devel] Improving S/N

2018-10-19 Thread Glen Brown
The exception, I assume, is with a strong local signal in the passband that causes clipping or requires reduction in rf gain. I use the notch filter for that OR get on the same tx phase with him. Glen W6GJB On Fri, Oct 19, 2018, 8:51 AM Frank Kirschner wrote: > Yes, that makes sense. I should

Re: [wsjt-devel] Improving S/N

2018-10-19 Thread Frank Kirschner
Yes, that makes sense. I should have realized that the narrow filtering had to be done somewhere. Frank On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:19 AM George J. Molnar wrote: > If I recall correctly, the S/N calculation is made in WSJT-X based on a > fixed value somewhere around 2.8 kHz. Applying a wider or

Re: [wsjt-devel] Improving S/N

2018-10-19 Thread Frank Kirschner
t; > Frank, seems indeed to work! Just tested during RX of station KG4HF with > bandwidth of either 3 kHz or 500 Hz. See the following S/N comparison. > Astonishing! > > > > > > 73 de Uwe, DG2YCB > > > > *Von:* Frank Kirschner [mailto:frank.kirsch...@gmai

Re: [wsjt-devel] Improving S/N

2018-10-19 Thread n2lo
sjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: 2018-10-19 11:08:40 AM Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Improving S/N Hi Frank, On 10/19/2018 9:47 AM, Frank Kirschner KF6E wrote: > One thing I haven't seen discussed on this reflector is improving the > S/N by narrowing the receiver bandwidth. It is no

Re: [wsjt-devel] Improving S/N

2018-10-19 Thread Ryan Tourge
ng RX of station KG4HF with > bandwidth of either 3 kHz or 500 Hz. See the following S/N comparison. > Astonishing! > > > > > > 73 de Uwe, DG2YCB > > > *Von:* Frank Kirschner [mailto:frank.kirsch...@gmail.com > ] > *Gesendet:* Freitag, 19. Oktober 2018 15:48 > *An:* W

Re: [wsjt-devel] Improving S/N

2018-10-19 Thread George J. Molnar
de Uwe, DG2YCB > > > Von: Frank Kirschner [mailto:frank.kirsch...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Oktober 2018 15:48 > An: WSJT software development > Betreff: [wsjt-devel] Improving S/N > > > One thing I haven't seen discussed on this reflector is improving t

Re: [wsjt-devel] Improving S/N

2018-10-19 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
ff: [wsjt-devel] Improving S/N   One thing I haven't seen discussed on this reflector is improving the S/N by narrowing the receiver bandwidth. It is no surprise that decreasing the bandwidth received increases the S/N, by 10 to 15 dB, sometimes more. When I see a station I want calling

Re: [wsjt-devel] Improving S/N

2018-10-19 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Frank, On 10/19/2018 9:47 AM, Frank Kirschner KF6E wrote: One thing I haven't seen discussed on this reflector is improving the S/N by narrowing the receiver bandwidth. It is no surprise that decreasing the bandwidth received increases the S/N, by 10 to 15 dB, sometimes more. When I see a s

Re: [wsjt-devel] Improving S/N

2018-10-19 Thread DG2YCB, Uwe
software development Betreff: [wsjt-devel] Improving S/N One thing I haven't seen discussed on this reflector is improving the S/N by narrowing the receiver bandwidth. It is no surprise that decreasing the bandwidth received increases the S/N, by 10 to 15 dB, sometimes more. When I

Re: [wsjt-devel] Improving S/N

2018-10-19 Thread David Alloza
WSJT software development Objet : [wsjt-devel] Improving S/N One thing I haven't seen discussed on this reflector is improving the S/N by narrowing the receiver bandwidth. It is no surprise that decreasing the bandwidth received increases the S/N, by 10 to 15 dB, sometimes more. Whe

[wsjt-devel] Improving S/N

2018-10-19 Thread Frank Kirschner
One thing I haven't seen discussed on this reflector is improving the S/N by narrowing the receiver bandwidth. It is no surprise that decreasing the bandwidth received increases the S/N, by 10 to 15 dB, sometimes more. When I see a station I want calling at -24 or so, I can narrow the BW and get so