Hi all,
It's OK to play with and test QRA64 at HF, if you wish. Some of our
earliest tests of the mode were done on the 20m and 30m bands.
But Greg is right: the mode is intended for EME, where every dB of
sensitivity matters a lot. We do not recommend any large-scale shift
from JT65 to QRA64
I'm confused on this thread. Joe has stated multiple times, the QRA
mode(s) are designed for EME use. Why are we tested this on HF?
Is there a plan to tweak the mode(s) for general HF use also? It seems
to me, if the current code is setup up for EME, testing on HF would only
confuse matters, but,
El 06/08/16 a las 18:12, Pino Zollo escribió:
> I am QRV at 14.076 TX3000 in QRA64 mode beaming Europe
Which submode QRA64A or QRA64B?
By TX3000 do you mean you're transmitting at 14.076 + 3000Hz?
I guess we should propose some common frequencies and modes to test QRA
in HF. 14.076 is already
I am QRV at 14.076 TX3000 in QRA64 mode beaming Europe
73
Pino ZP4KFX
--
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/lis
