Re: [wsjt-devel] S+P operation

2019-05-06 Thread Paul Kube
Joe -- > I think you'll get what you want (for contesting) if you check only > these (top to bottom) on the Settings -> Colors tab: > > X My Call in message > X New DXCC > X New Call on Band > Thanks, yes, that does it. > No guarantees that we are maintaining our sanity! Would you like to

Re: [wsjt-devel] S+P operation

2019-05-03 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Paul, On 5/2/2019 8:43 PM, Paul Kube K6PO wrote: The documentation http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/FT4_Protocol.pdf says, re S+P: "Here “best potential QSO partner” means “New Multiplier” (1st priority) or “New Call on Band” (2nd priority)." Now it seems to me that "New Call" i

Re: [wsjt-devel] S+P operation

2019-05-02 Thread Paul Kube
The documentation http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/FT4_Protocol.pdf says, re S+P: "Here “best potential QSO partner” means “New Multiplier” (1st priority) or “New Call on Band” (2nd priority)." Now it seems to me that "New Call" implies "New Call on Band", and so should qualify as a potent

[wsjt-devel] S+P operation

2019-05-02 Thread WB5JJJ
Trying new features with FT4 and noticed that when S+P is active during non-CQ (receive only) operation, it will pounce on stations using directed calls such as CQ DX WB5JJJ EM35. In a contest situation, which FT4 is designed for, this would be fine since there will not be any directed CQ's typica