-Original Message-
From: KI7MT
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 18:26
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Summary of wsprnet.org server processing times
Hi Joe,
FWIW, I think this is a good Idea. I addition to the Hamlib updates, I
would think the Qt Audio subsystem would
Hi Joe,
FWIW, I think this is a good Idea. I addition to the Hamlib updates, I
would think the Qt Audio subsystem would also be of benefit.
I like Python, but keeping the tool-chains and frameworks similar would
surely be a plus and may even draw more developers to the project(s).
There seems
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 2:17 PM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Summary of wsprnet.org server processing times
Comments on this possible course of action would be welcome, from anyone!
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
I would love
On 04/22/2015 03:17 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Joe,
> Comments on this possible course of action would be welcome, from anyone!
I share your opinion and I find this a very good idea.
Best 88 de Claude (DJ0OT)
--
BPM Cam
Hi John,
Many thanks for sharing your interesting results on processing time
returned by the wsprnet.org server!
Your recent work with WSPR-X has prodded me to think again about
possible future developments of WSPR. I'm presently leaning toward
exploring the possibility of including WSPR as a
