I think it should be possible to develop a script to run in the background that
updates logs files of both instances, if I succeed I will share the solution
here.
73 de CT1GVN
On Monday, August 21, 2017, 5:00:23 PM GMT+1, Pino Zollo
wrote:
El 21/08/17 a las 10:49, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists
El 21/08/17 a las 10:49, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net escribió:
> Do you need a unique logging file because of importing to another program or
> because of updating the worked B4 status in both instances ?
Alexandre
For WB4 and new-ones ...
73
Do you need a unique logging file because of importing to another program or
because of updating the worked B4 status in both instances ?
On Sunday, August 20, 2017, 2:28:08 AM GMT+1, Pino Zollo
wrote:
I am running two instances of WSJT-X 1.8...with two different radios...
on Linux
is
To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Sent:* Saturday, August 19, 2017 8:28 PM
*Subject:* [wsjt-devel] Two instances
I am running two instances of WSJT-X 1.8...with two different radios...
on Linux
is it possible to have a single, unic, logging file ?
can I do symbolic links without messing up the log data
Yes...the ADIF file is used for WSJT-X's B4. JTAlert is a much better and more
powerful solution for that though.
de Mike W9MDB
From: Pino Zollo
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 7:23 AM
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Two instances
El 19/08/17
jtx had the same informations.
> de Mike W9MDB
>
> From: Pino Zollo
> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2017 8:28 PM
> Subject: [wsjt-devel] Two instances
>
> I am running two instances of WSJT-X 1.8...with two different r
o the ADIF file?
de Mike W9MDB
From: Pino Zollo
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2017 8:28 PM
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Two instances
I am running two instances of WSJT-X 1.8...with two different radios...
on Linux
is it possible to have a single, uni
I am running two instances of WSJT-X 1.8...with two different radios...
on Linux
is it possible to have a single, unic, logging file ?
can I do symbolic links without messing up the log data ?
TU 73
Pino ZP4KFX
