[wsjt-devel] UDP Defect WSJT-X 1.8.0 r8193. QSO Logged packet, Dial Freq data incorrect.

2017-11-22 Thread Laurie, VK3AMA
WSJT-X 1.8.0 r8193. The UDP QSO Logged packet defines the following... Dial frequency (Hz) quint64 In my tests, the frequency being conveyed in the data is the Dial plus Tx DF. Is this a defect or by design? The UDP Status packet defines a similar Dial frequency and in my tests it is corr

Re: [wsjt-devel] UDP Defect WSJT-X 1.8.0 r8193. QSO Logged packet, Dial Freq data incorrect.

2017-11-22 Thread Bill Somerville
On 22/11/2017 22:05, Laurie, VK3AMA wrote: WSJT-X 1.8.0 r8193. The UDP QSO Logged packet defines the following... Dial frequency (Hz) quint64 In my tests, the frequency being conveyed in the data is the Dial plus Tx DF. Is this a defect or by design? The UDP Status packet defines a simila

Re: [wsjt-devel] UDP Defect WSJT-X 1.8.0 r8193. QSO Logged packet, Dial Freq data incorrect.

2017-11-22 Thread Laurie, VK3AMA
On 23/11/2017 9:34 AM, Bill Somerville wrote: Hi Laurie, the frequency provided is consistent with what is logged to the WSJT-X log files. The Status message provides the displayed dial frequency and also contains the current Rx and Tx offsets so you can have all options from that. I belie

Re: [wsjt-devel] UDP Defect WSJT-X 1.8.0 r8193. QSO Logged packet, Dial Freq data incorrect.

2017-11-22 Thread G8DQX (WSJT developers on SF)
Laurie, the /QSO Logged/ datagram is *coherent* in that the ADIF field *FREQ* is defined to be "QSO frequency in Megahertz", which would be dial frequency plus TX offset, allowing for the datagram fields to be represented in Hz, rather than MHz. There is also an ADIF field *FREQ_RX* defined a