Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - Hamlib status update.

2014-04-17 Thread Bill Somerville
On 17/04/2014 17:06, KI7MT wrote: > Hi Bill, Hi Greg, > > So for now, we still step need to use the two step process, git > checkout, then up with your integration changes, then build it yes? It is up to you to a certain extent. Although you are describing a process which is an initial step. > > H

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - Hamlib status update.

2014-04-17 Thread KI7MT
Hi Bill, So for now, we still step need to use the two step process, git checkout, then up with your integration changes, then build it yes? How do see this changing in the future? 73's Greg, KI7MT On 4/17/2014 09:48, Bill Somerville wrote: > Hi All, > > just a heads up, nobody needs to chang

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X - Hamlib status update.

2014-04-17 Thread Bill Somerville
Hi All, just a heads up, nobody needs to change anything just yet. All my pending changes in the integration branch of my Hamlib fork have been accepted into Hamlib. Currently that branch, the master branch in my fork and the Hamlib official master branch are all in sync. 73 Bill G4WJS. -