Hi all,
I have a question regarding editing JSP tag files in Eclipse. I have
two tag files:
1. "included.tagf" which contains a bunch of import statements
2. "test.tag" which includes the "included.tagf" using the following at the top
<%@ include file="included.tagf" %>
When editing the "test.ta
False alarm. I was reading that bug incorrectly.
Still wouldn't hurt for you users of servlet API to consider (or test!)
what happens if 2.5 happens to be in plugin stack ... so you won't be
surprised like the help team was :) ... but if that happens, doesn't look
like it will be from the plat
Specifically, that is. There's some discussion about the platform moving
up to servlet 2.5 API.
See bug
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225629
(which our own Gary Karasiuk found while he was playing around :)
I know several of you depend on the servlet API ... but, not sure if an
> I'd appreciate a pointer - I'm a newbie here and so far this is the only
> list I'm on. It's probably not quite the right list =).
Sure, welcome to Eclipse!
The newsgroup is named
news.eclipse.org
The newsgroup for the Data Tools Platform is
eclipse.dtp
And, the one for WTP is, inconsis
Thanks, David. Please see inline below.
David M Williams wrote:
Rochelle,
Eventually this sounds like a question for the DTP project, since you
refer to the JDBC Wizard, which I assume would be theirs.
And, as with most Eclipse lists, they'd probably prefer you ask on the
newsgroup, instead
Rochelle,
Eventually this sounds like a question for the DTP project, since you
refer to the JDBC Wizard, which I assume would be theirs.
And, as with most Eclipse lists, they'd probably prefer you ask on the
newsgroup, instead of the committers mailing list.
And, I'll give one pointer.
htt
Hi Rochelle,
Tim is back next week, but if you have more question feel free to send me
an email, don't wait for him. I can probably answer your question.
This mailing list is mainly for communication between all the WTP
developers, we also have some newsgroups setup that are more suitable for
The default InferenceEngine will create an anonymous type when is sees a
Object Literal.
Assuming that you have override handleFunctionCall() in you inferengine to
process the "qx.Class.define", in that code
you would "drill down" to that object initializer and call "traverse()" in
its field in
On Apr 8, 2008, at 2:04 AM, Phil Berkland wrote:
This "this" should have the same type as the current context in the
InferEngine. You can set the current context by doing
"currentContext.currentType= ??".
If we see a "this.something" in a function, we assume there is
somekind of object inv
