Re: [wtp-dev] Declaring Build for wtp-R3.9.3-M: S-3.9.3RC4-20180302093744

> On 7 Mar 2018, at 20.37, Jesper Steen Møller <jes...@selskabet.org> wrote: > > >> On 7 Mar 2018, at 17.40, Nick Boldt <nbo...@redhat.com> wrote: >> [...] >> Has anyone started work on JDK 10 support in WTP? Just curious in which >> projects I sh

Re: [wtp-dev] Declaring Build for wtp-R3.9.3-M: S-3.9.3RC4-20180302093744

> On 7 Mar 2018, at 17.40, Nick Boldt wrote: > [...] > Has anyone started work on JDK 10 support in WTP? Just curious in which > projects I should expect to see changes. > I really doubt there's anything to do for WTP for JDK 10, unless there is a classfile version check

Re: [wtp-dev] Question on XML Validation and oracle xsds

Hi Keith and Rob (You probably know all this already, but I’ll just add what I know) I touched some of the validator code a few years back: The number of URI resolver interfaces is horrible - one from Platform, one from Xerces and one from WTP as I recall), each introducing a slight impedance

Re: [wtp-dev] Psychopath XPath 2.0

Hi Asiri, The XPath2 engine is available through the P2 repositories (only - at this point). If you are using Apache Maven for building, you can use Tycho to fetch the dependencies through P2, as described at StackOverflow [2] If you just want the JAR file and play with them, you're probably

Re: [wtp-dev] project-specific XSD resolution question

Good to hear you're having progress. The real issue is that the DOM and SAX interfaces do not pass any sort of context down through the layers. Instantiating a new resolver dynamically would take care of that, but Eclipse's URIResolvers / URIResolverExtensions are statically instantiated from the

Re: [wtp-dev] project-specific XSD resolution question

The XSL tooling plugin uses a resolverExtension to accomplish something similar. You may be able to find pointers there. IIRC, it is the core plugin. Mind you, they will be cases where you can't find a project, in case a resource is loaded directly from the file system, e.g. with File Open

Re: [wtp-dev] Request : Joining Eclipse developer community

Hi Suraj On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:29 AM, SURAJ RAJYAGURU suraj_rajyag...@yahoo.com wrote: I am keen on being part of the Eclipse developer community and make contribution to Eclipse. Please let me know if there is a possiblity for the same. This sounds great! First off, there's a

Re: [wtp-dev] new branch for unit tests for XPath2 JDK 1.4 code base

Hi Mukul I think it is worth investigating moving the HEAD unit test suite to 1.4 as well -- surely, Xerces can't stay with the 3.2.x branch forever, it has severe performance issues (waste of memory), since the processor is at least compilable under JRE 1.4 in HEAD (using the jsr14

Re: [wtp-dev] Enhancement Request

Hi Lance Indeed this is not the right list. The projects at Eclipse all use Bugzilla to track enhancement requests (as well as bugs). You should open an account ( https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/ ) and create your enhancement request there, using this categorization: Classification: WebTools

Re: [wtp-dev] Fw: Server adapters and supporting BPEL module type

Hi list Angel Vera wrote: When I first read your email I was a little confused about what you were requesting. Perhaps it was due to my speed reading, but I wanted to sit down and read it in more details, before I ask any questions. With your second note things are more clear in my head

Re: [wtp-dev] Loading a ContentModel correctly

Hi Dave I've been using org.eclipse.wst.xml.core.internal.contentmodel.modelquery.CMDocumentManager.getCMDocument(String, String, String), but first you need to set the properties PROPERTY_AUTO_LOAD = true and PROPERTY_ASYNC_LOAD = false on the CMDocumentManager. -Jesper On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at

Re: [wtp-dev] Question about XML Catalog Contributions

We had this problem in XSL Tools, and ended up writing a specialized resolver for it which peeked the version and returned the correct schema. Having to write a resolver for each such schema doesn't scale well in the general case, and is hidden from the user (i.e. doesn't show up in the catalog),

Re: [wtp-dev] XML2EMF handling for ANY

Cameron Bateman wrote: Has any work been done to support DTD ANY and XSD anyType data in the XML2EMF translators? If not, what is the current design thinking in this area? I've thought a bit about its use. xsd:anyType and friends would need special support in both EMF2SAX and EMF2DOM and

Re: [wtp-dev] Minutes of the JEE 5 Working Group meeting 11/30/2006

Raev, Kaloyan wrote: Hello, Since there are the minutes are not in the wiki yet, I answer to the mail. I want to put a comment on a part of the discussion: # MA: Is any of this will be in WTP2.0? WTP 1.5.2 is not EJB3 friendly. We need a release of WTP 1.5 that does not complain about

Re: [wtp-dev] Java EE 5 models design overview

Raev, Kaloyan wrote: Hi Jesper, We have taken a look at the J2EE 1.4 models implementation. It did make impression that there are lots of hand made tweaks there. I'm a bit confused. You've seen/commented on bug 157185 covering most of the XML side of J2EE, excluding annotations, so you

Re: [wtp-dev] Trip Report from EclipseSummit Europe, 2006

David M Williams wrote: ? from Artwaresoft ajax interest wondered if work was being done to provide javascript performance tools (he thought there was a great need). [I told him there'd been talk between Ajax team and TPTP, but no concrete plans].

Re: [wtp-dev] EMF 3.0 will require Java 5.0

Konstantin Komissarchik wrote: I will throw something else out for this discussion... The current (1.4-level) EMF-generated classes that ship with WTP are rather difficult to use for those adopters who are using java 5.0. The reason is that as soon as you access this api Eclipse floods you

Re: [wtp-dev] User Interface Consistency initiative

Hi Janet, An intriguing task you've got ahead of you. As I see it, the WSDL graph editor is a recurring source of annoyance: It is simply too wide and complicated (mirroring WSDL1.1, I suppose...) to give a full overview. As I see it, it could be simplified a lot in the case of