tectural issues."
To
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
cc
Subject
RE: [wtp-dev] ArtifactEdits, Java EE 5, old code, and new code
I also agree.
On a somewhat related note, the old code exposed the factory for creating
the J2EE EMF
Raev, Kaloyan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/03/2007 12:20 PM
Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
To
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
cc
Subject
RE: [wtp-dev] Artifac
Team
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Lanuti
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 11:57 AM
To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Subject: RE: [wtp-dev] ArtifactEdits, Java EE 5, old code, and new code
I think Kaloyan
l discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
To
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
cc
Subject
RE: [wtp-dev] ArtifactEdits, Java EE 5, old code, and new code
Hello,
Let me explain in written form what I have tried to tell on the phon
Hello,
Let me explain in written form what I have tried to tell on the phone line.
Let's go to the validateDisplayName() method of the
org.eclipse.jst.j2ee.internal.web.operations.NewServletClassDataModelProvide
r class.
This method checks if the given servlet name already duplicates the name
