Re: [Wtr-general] Installing watir 1.5 actually installs 1.4.1 again

2007-07-20 Thread Ċ½eljko Filipin
On 7/20/07, vipin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I then downloaded "watir-bonus-1.5.1.1192.zip" Hi Vipin, You should have downloaded watir gem, not bonus zip. Zeljko -- ZeljkoFilipin.com ___ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org http://ru

[Wtr-general] Installing watir 1.5 actually installs 1.4.1 again

2007-07-20 Thread vipin
Hi, I have watir 1.4.1. I uninstalled it by typing gem uninstall watir. I then downloaded "watir-bonus-1.5.1.1192.zip" on desktop I open cmd, cd to desktop and typed gem install watir. It starts installing 1.4.1 again I then uninstalled ruby, reinstalled it and followed same steps. Again it inst

Re: [Wtr-general] Installing watir 1.5 actually installs 1.4.1 again

2007-07-20 Thread marekj
One word of caution with downloaded gems. Use 'gem install watir --local' option to to pick up the downloaded gem and not the --remote marekj On 7/20/07, vipin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have watir 1.4.1. I uninstalled it by typing gem uninstall watir. I then downloaded "watir-bonus-1.5

Re: [Wtr-general] Installing watir 1.5 actually installs 1.4.1 again

2007-07-20 Thread Bret Pettichord
marekj wrote: > One word of caution with downloaded gems. > Use 'gem install watir --local' option to to pick up the downloaded > gem and not the --remote > Actually, this only matters if you didn't actually download the gem to the current directory. _

Re: [Wtr-general] Installing watir 1.5 actually installs 1.4.1 again

2007-07-20 Thread marekj
Thanks. I wasn't aware that gem command scans working dir first. Here it is "gem install... It will attempt a local installation (i.e. a .gem file in the current directory), and if that fails, it will attempt to download" http://rubygems.org/read/chapter/10#page33 Note to self: read instructions a

[Wtr-general] Inconsistent results for nested tables

2007-07-20 Thread Philip Rhoades
People, The following script returns 1 most of the time but about 25% of the time returns the correct value of 8. There is one main table and 7 sub tables - why would the results vary? Thanks, Phil. PS System: Fedora 7 + FF 2.0.0.4 #!/usr/bin/ruby require 'rubygems' require 'firewatir' in

Re: [Wtr-general] ie.new vs. ie.goto() Re: goto in IE7 on Vista

2007-07-20 Thread Nathan Viboonchan
I got the same problem but now found the solution. -goto IE7 security settings -uncheck Enable Protected Mode box -restart IE7 This should keep ie.goto stay in the same window ___ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/m