Re: [Wtr-general] Wtr-general Digest, Vol 31, Issue 16

2006-06-07 Thread Jared Quinert
I think the point is that any script activity after a click is non-instantaneous.  That leaves a window where your test script progresses, checks to see if IE is busy, and is told 'No, IE is not loading a page', but then a fraction of a second later, it may begin loading a page.  The process

Re: [Wtr-general] Wtr-general Digest, Vol 31, Issue 16

2006-06-07 Thread Lonny Eachus
I thought you meant there was an explicit delay. While I do not doubt what you say, it seems strange that even a mess of _javascript_ should take very long. On the other hand, in recent months I have seen some _javascript_ that was, indeed, a real mess. Can you be more specific about what it i

Re: [Wtr-general] Wtr-general Digest, Vol 31, Issue 16

2006-06-07 Thread Lonny Eachus
By automatically, I would hope you mean a kind of "wait_for()" method, rather than doing it unseen in the background. At first thought it seems the latter would be terribly inefficient, especially since it is only necessary in relatively rare cases. Time and efficiency are definitely a concern