> I checked web resources and I added imformation on Runtime issues.
> If you think this is not good imformation, please refactor that.
>
> http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/WxHaskell/Install#Runtime_issues
Cool. I've made some minor modifications (moving it up a section and
adding a link).
-
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 03:11:49 +0900, shelarcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> By the way, I just noticed why you originally suggested waiting for
>> wxWidgets 2.8 support (because 2.6 can't build on Leopard). Not sure
>> what to do about it. Some online forums suggest compiling it with the
>> 10.4 S
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 02:20:29 +0900, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a good
> reason for wx to be calling wxcore-clean?
I forgot about that.
I'll check that morning or afternoon.
(I'm sleepy now.)
> By the way, I just noticed why you originally suggested waiting for
> wxWidgets 2.8
Hi,
> It seems that your patch break bindist.
Argh :-)
> ifdef ENABLE-PROF
> wx: wx-main-only wx-prof
> else
> wx: wx-main-only
> endif
> wx-main-only: wxcore-clean wx-main
Huh. So that's why it kept recompiling wxcore. Is there a good
reason for wx to be calling wxcore-clean?
> $doc
Hi Eric,
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 23:22:48 +0900, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More stuff related to a 0.10.3 release candidate. Basically fixes to 'make
> bindist' on my end, and some documentation. Now we need people to make
> packages for their platforms, test them out, etc.
It seems tha
More stuff related to a 0.10.3 release candidate. Basically fixes to 'make
bindist' on my end, and some documentation. Now we need people to make
packages for their platforms, test them out, etc.
Tue Mar 4 22:43:27 GMT 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Bump to 0.10.3.
Wed Mar 5 10:32:28
