Re: [wxhaskell-users] autogenerating wxc from wxWidgets?Doxygen output?

Hi Eric Y. Kow wrote: > Thanks, Kevin! > > I'm just forwarding to wxhaskell-users in case Mads has a reply :-) > > I'll note that in the body of my message, I only cut and paste a small > extract of the output. Maybe this is what Mads was referring to? > > email message attachment > >

Re: [wxhaskell-users] autogenerating wxc from wxWidgets Doxygen output?

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:57:30 +0200, Mads Lindstrøm wrote: > Besides the overly verbose syntax, I did not feel like XSLT were a good > match for the task. I realise you weren't talking about the syntax, but in case it plays a role in this, there is always PXSL, which has significantly dampened

Re: [wxhaskell-users] autogenerating wxc from wxWidgets Doxygen output?

Hi Eric Kow wrote: > This is where Kevin Ollivier of wxWidgets pointed out something > interesting: in the current wxWidgets trunk, it should be possible to > automatically generate the C bindings from the Doxygen XML output. In > fact, he has already done something similar for Python, metadata

Re: [wxhaskell-users] autogenerating wxc from wxWidgets?Doxygen output?

Thanks, Kevin! I'm just forwarding to wxhaskell-users in case Mads has a reply :-) I'll note that in the body of my message, I only cut and paste a small extract of the output. Maybe this is what Mads was referring to? -- Eric Kow PGP Key ID: 08AC

Re: [wxhaskell-users] autogenerating wxc from wxWidgets Doxygen output?

Hi Eric Kow wrote: > On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 18:57:29 +0100, Eric Kow wrote: > > This is where Kevin Ollivier of wxWidgets pointed out something > > interesting: in the current wxWidgets trunk, it should be possible to > > automatically generate the C bindings from the Doxygen XML output. In > >

Re: [wxhaskell-users] autogenerating wxc from wxWidgets Doxygen output?

Hi Eric Kow wrote: > I'm vaguely aware that our copy of wxc has some information which helps > us keep track of the wxWidgets class hierarchy. Presumably the same > information could be autogenerated as well? This sort of thing has been > suggested before (people have mentioned SWIG). > It see

Re: [wxhaskell-users] [Haskell-cafe] Re: WX: linking to system libraries statically

2009/04/09 FFT : > I noticed that even simple WX demos like "Layout" are linked > dynamically against 59 libraries on Linux. This would make > distributing the binaries a nightmare. Is there a simple way > to make a (mostly) statically linked binary? I have had mixed success with `-static -optl-