On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 15:29:29 -0500, Brian Lewis wrote:
> One of the first things the makefile does is build wxdirect, so I split
> it off and cleaned it up a little bit:
> http://github.com/bsl/wxdirect/tree/master . It could be put on HDB.
Looks good to me. And now that we have that little s
I think it'd be good to replace the darcs wxhaskell/makefile with
wxhaskell.cabal, if possible.
One of the first things the makefile does is build wxdirect, so I split
it off and cleaned it up a little bit:
http://github.com/bsl/wxdirect/tree/master . It could be put on HDB. My
intention is that l
OK, I think I'm starting to remember more bits and pieces...
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 18:18:09 +0200, Lennart Kolmodin wrote:
> I recently tried to make Gentoo Linux ebuilds for wxHaskell. We've had
> support in the past, for the 0.9.x series, and would like to support the
> new 0.11.x too. I spent
Eric Y. Kow wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 14:00:49 -0500, Brian Lewis wrote:
>> [snip] It should not be trying to circumvent cabal's normal
>> procedure for package registration.
>
> I agree with you. This one stupid little issue makes wxHaskell
> difficult to install. It drives me absolutely
On Sunday, 09.08.09 at 00:15, Eric Y. Kow wrote:
> Does this work better?
> cabal install wx --configure-opt="--user --enable-split-objs --hcprof"
I'll try. Thanks.
> In the darcs version of wxHaskell, I've also attempted to split
> wxcore off so that it is cleanly Cabalised (just the Simple buil
On Saturday, 08.08.09 at 23:24, S. Doaitse Swierstra wrote:
> http://noordering.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/cabals-default-install-location/
I don't think that's relevant, firstly, because my ~/.cabal/config says
explicitly to install packages in ~/.cabal, and secondly, because the wx
cabal package s
