On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 21:03:27 +0200, Sebastian Klüft wrote:
> > Hmm, that's interesting. Are you using the stock wxWidgets or one that
> > you built yourself?
>
> Yes I have (sort of). I have installed wxWidgets through MacPorts, so
> it's built on this machine but everything is done automagic
Eric Y. Kow wrote:
> For the moment, you need both git and darcs.
>
> Until we hear back from the wxHaskell team, work on wxcore is taking
> place on github. If the team respond, I think we should start
> submitting patches so that the wxHaskell darcs repository catches up.
>
Eric, I'll try to
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 14:04:30 +0100, Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote:
> > Until we hear back from the wxHaskell team, work on wxcore is taking
> > place on github. If the team respond, I think we should start
> > submitting patches so that the wxHaskell darcs repository catches up.
> >
> Eric, I'll
Dear wxHaskell hackers:
Fetching wxhaskell via darcs is currently a lot slower than it needs to
be because darcs is forced to (a) fetch every file and (b) perform an
on-the-fly conversion from an old-fashioned repo to a hashed repository.
I would like to convert this repository to the hashed form
