Re: [wxlua-users] wxConfig

2007-07-11 Thread John Labenski
On 7/11/07, Leslie Newell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi John, > > > It was changed because every other function that returns multiple > > values all returned the return value of the function as the first > > parameter. I have been trying to reduce the number of "gotcha's" in > > wxLua to make it

Re: [wxlua-users] wxConfig

2007-07-11 Thread Leslie Newell
Hi John, > It was changed because every other function that returns multiple > values all returned the return value of the function as the first > parameter. I have been trying to reduce the number of "gotcha's" in > wxLua to make it less annoying for some, but more annoying for others. > :) >

Re: [wxlua-users] wxConfig

2007-07-11 Thread John Labenski
On 7/11/07, Leslie Newell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am a fairly long term user of lua and wxWidgets and I have just > started using wxLua. I am using a fairly current snapshot. > > I am having a couple of issues with wxConfig at the moment. First, why > is the value pushed on to the re

[wxlua-users] wxConfig

2007-07-11 Thread Leslie Newell
Hi, I am a fairly long term user of lua and wxWidgets and I have just started using wxLua. I am using a fairly current snapshot. I am having a couple of issues with wxConfig at the moment. First, why is the value pushed on to the return stack first then the read flag? Normally if you specify a