Re: [wxlua-users] And now XP ...

2007-02-28 Thread Brian Haag
On 2/28/07, Anders F Björklund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > They're hidden in the "apps" folder :-) > Maybe it should be mentioned in ReadMe ? Oh, man. Sometimes the best thing to do is to just hang your head, apologize, and move on. They're right there and work beautifully. Thanks. =) ---

Re: [wxlua-users] And now XP ...

2007-02-28 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Hi, John Labenski ha scritto: > On 2/28/07, Brian Haag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ok ... not sure if these should be included with the binary, but this file >> and MSVCP71.dll were both needed to get things running. I grabbed them from >> a .dll download site, and things appear to be working .

Re: [wxlua-users] And now XP ...

2007-02-28 Thread Anders F Björklund
Brian Haag wrote: > That's what I started with.  I'm not at home in front of my mac, but > I'm pretty sure that .dmg is just a folder with all the source in it.  > I couldn't find an executable or an .app. They're hidden in the "apps" folder :-) Maybe it should be mentioned in ReadMe ? Otherwi

Re: [wxlua-users] And now XP ...

2007-02-28 Thread Anders F Björklund
John Labenski wrote: > Glad you got it working, since I have Visual Studio 2005 (the free > one) installed I already have that dll. > I guess in the future we need to compile the binaries with the old MS > Visual C 6. The newer Visual Cs have horrible dependency problems like > this. > > Unfortuna

Re: [wxlua-users] And now XP ...

2007-02-28 Thread John Labenski
On 2/28/07, Doug Currie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, February 28, 2007 John Labenski wrote: > > > I guess in the future we need to compile the binaries with the old MS > > Visual C 6. The newer Visual Cs have horrible dependency problems like > > this. > > > [...] Unfortunately mingw

Re: [wxlua-users] And now XP ...

2007-02-28 Thread Doug Currie
On Wednesday, February 28, 2007 John Labenski wrote: > I guess in the future we need to compile the binaries with the old MS > Visual C 6. The newer Visual Cs have horrible dependency problems like > this. > [...] Unfortunately mingw makes large binaries As a mingw user, I am curious... how muc

Re: [wxlua-users] And now XP ...

2007-02-28 Thread Brian Haag
On 2/28/07, Anders F Björklund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: BTW; Did you try the binary for Mac OS X ? I assumed that you *wanted* to compile it yourself... http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/wxlua/wxlua-2.8.0.0-tiger.dmg? That's what I started with. I'm not at home in front of my mac, but I'm

Re: [wxlua-users] And now XP ...

2007-02-28 Thread John Labenski
On 2/28/07, Brian Haag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok ... not sure if these should be included with the binary, but this file > and MSVCP71.dll were both needed to get things running. I grabbed them from > a .dll download site, and things appear to be working ... I've got an > interpreter up, any

Re: [wxlua-users] And now XP ...

2007-02-28 Thread Anders F Björklund
Brian Haag wrote: > After failing to get wxLua running on OS X, I thought I'd try WinXP to > get an idea of what's supposed to be happening. BTW; Did you try the binary for Mac OS X ? I assumed that you *wanted* to compile it yourself... http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/wxlua/wxlua-2.8.0.0

Re: [wxlua-users] And now XP ...

2007-02-28 Thread Brian Haag
Ok ... not sure if these should be included with the binary, but this file and MSVCP71.dll were both needed to get things running. I grabbed them from a .dll download site, and things appear to be working ... I've got an interpreter up, anyway. On 2/28/07, Brian Haag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[wxlua-users] And now XP ...

2007-02-28 Thread Brian Haag
After failing to get wxLua running on OS X, I thought I'd try WinXP to get an idea of what's supposed to be happening. Only it doesn't work, either, at least if you use the binary package from the download page. I downloaded: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/wxlua/wxLua-2.8.0.0-setup.exe?downl