On 12/20/06, Francesco Montorsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> klaas.holwerda ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I read lua5.1.lib was needed. So this exe renaming is not a mistake??
> > I keep changing pack and forth, i don't know any what is right :-(
> > Will it hopefully be the same naming on Unix?
> v
klaas.holwerda ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I read lua5.1.lib was needed. So this exe renaming is not a mistake??
> I keep changing pack and forth, i don't know any what is right :-(
> Will it hopefully be the same naming on Unix?
very sorry about that.
"lua" is now the definitive name (unless others f
Hi,
I read lua5.1.lib was needed. So this exe renaming is not a mistake??
I keep changing pack and forth, i don't know any what is right :-(
Will it hopefully be the same naming on Unix?
Klaas
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash.