Hi, Dave,
You are accessing the method size() of the *field* a_prefix_sum
of the current object (i.e., "this"). However, the message says
that the *target* of the method *must be local* to the place you
are running in. It then says what it thinks that place is, and
what it knows about the place
Hi Igor (and all),
Here is the output from the compiler:
dhu...@oscnet166 125%> x10c++ -STATIC_CALLS -o Driver Driver.x10 PrefixSum.x10
AsyncPrefixSum.x10 DistPrefixSum.x10
/Users/dhudak/osc/research/x10/tutorial/examples/GoodPrefixSum/src/AsyncPrefixSum.x10:48:
Place type error: either method
Hi, Dave,
You're accessing a field (or calling a method) of a remote object
reference. If you ran the compiler with the -STATIC_CALLS flag,
you would have gotten a compile-time error. As it is, the
compiler inserts a dynamic check for you, which then fails at
runtime.
Try compiling your program
Hi All,
I took Igor's advice on using a cell to pass results back to the calling place.
I recoded my function for translating a distarray into a string as follows.
The "boo/hoo" statements are line counters:
public def place_str(): String
{
Console.OUT.println("hoo");
Igor Peshansky/Watson/i...@ibmus wrote on 07/28/2010 07:15:02 PM:
> Dave Hudak wrote on 07/28/2010 02:37:22 PM:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am trying to write a class that will do a prefix sum on an array. I
> > have written the single-place version and a single-place version that
> > uses multip
Dave Hudak wrote on 07/28/2010 02:37:22 PM:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to write a class that will do a prefix sum on an array. I
> have written the single-place version and a single-place version that
> uses multiple activities to compute the sums. I am now trying to
> write the distributed v
Hi All,
I am trying to write a class that will do a prefix sum on an array. I have
written the single-place version and a single-place version that uses multiple
activities to compute the sums. I am now trying to write the distributed
version. Both classes are included (I will eventually wri
