Re: [x265] [PATCH] threadpool: fix memory leak

On 07/21/17 09:29, ar...@multicorewareinc.com wrote: # HG changeset patch # User Aruna Matheswaran # Date 1500457328 -19800 # Wed Jul 19 15:12:08 2017 +0530 # Branch stable # Node ID fd354d5ec1328a000c24e1551804a1ce569ec3b0 # Parent adbcc90bdef36b50a091deb5b0d0ad77debfbee7 threadpool: fix

Re: [x265] [PATCH] threadpool: fix memory leak

Ooops! Thanks for catching this! I'll resend it. On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Andrey Semashev wrote: > On 07/21/17 09:29, ar...@multicorewareinc.com wrote: > >> # HG changeset patch >> # User Aruna Matheswaran >> # Date 1500457328 -19800 >> # Wed Jul 19 15:12:08 2017 +0530 >> # Branch

[x265] [PATCH] threadpool: fix memory leak

# HG changeset patch # User Aruna Matheswaran # Date 1500457328 -19800 # Wed Jul 19 15:12:08 2017 +0530 # Branch stable # Node ID a1336339534466b86ec62ed3ddc2695c794d7b58 # Parent adbcc90bdef36b50a091deb5b0d0ad77debfbee7 threadpool: fix memory leak diff -r adbcc90bdef3 -r a13363395344 sourc

Re: [x265] [PATCH] intra: skip RD analysis when sum of sub CU splitcost bigger than non-split cost

Ximing - thanks for your contribution! Pradeep - This early decision optimization certainly looks like it has good potential to be a smart tradeoff for intermediate presets (like medium). Sure, the test was only for 2 seconds of video, but for this test case we see a 10% performance gain with n

Re: [x265] [PATCH] intra: skip RD analysis when sum of sub CUsplitcost bigger than non-split cost

I will give my test cases later, and I will add a ci option on this skip. As I was very busy on workdays, sorry for late. ---Original--- From: "Tom Vaughan" Date: 2017/7/22 03:33:28 To: "Development for x265"; Subject: Re: [x265] [PATCH] intra: skip RD analysis when sum of sub CUsplitcost bigge