Hi Oliver,
On So 20 Feb 2011 16:41:53 CET Oliver Burger wrote:
Hi there,
I'm just about to begin packaging x2go for Mageia. But I'm a bit
confused about which versions to take.
Is it recommended to stay with the old ones from pool-lenny or are the
ones in pool-heuler reasonably stable?
Yours,
Hi there,
Ok, now here the official mail that shall shortly propose an improved
Git project tree for X2go upstream.
At http://git.x2go.org you will currently find some X2go project that
start with _old_ and some starting with _new_
As already mentioned in a former reply to Morty's
Hi again,
On Mo 21 Feb 2011 23:02:11 CET Mike Gabriel wrote:
o contain a pristine-tar branch
o contain a nearly complete history
(that is as many of the older releases as possible) on the x2go-dev ML.
o release numbers do not contain hyphens (''-'') anymore
o all X2go projects have a a.b
Hi Morty, dear Heinz, dear Alex,
On Mo 21 Feb 2011 21:52:51 CET Moritz Strübe wrote:
Hi there,
I've noticed that all the repos at http://code.x2go.org/gitweb were
renamed with a prefix _old_. What is the reason for this? Renaming repos
really is not a nice thing to do, as all clones must be ad
Hi there,
I've noticed that all the repos at http://code.x2go.org/gitweb were
renamed with a prefix _old_. What is the reason for this? Renaming repos
really is not a nice thing to do, as all clones must be adjusted. And if
you set up new repos the checksums will not match anymore, breaking the
pa
Hello Mike,
hello list,
Am 20.02.2011 10:48, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
> So, @Heinz and/or Alex: Could you please give your opinion on this
> discussion rather sooner than later?
The x2go usergroup was used to restrict the access to "x2gopgwrapper".
This main use case is no longer existant, because o
