V Wed, 4 May 2011 09:26:52 +0200
Jo-Erlend Schinstad napsáno:
> 2011/5/4 John Williams :
> > 2011/5/3 Milan Knížek :
> >> This is by the way the reason, why I am in a search for a GNOME
> >> replacement...
>
> Since you said you're looking for a replacement for Gnome, I want to
> add something:
2011/5/4 John Williams :
> 2011/5/3 Milan Knížek :
>
>> Gnome 3 requires a hw support from the video card. Before the upgrade,
>> have you successfully used some compositing window manager through x2go
>> (compiz, metacity with compositing enabled)? I doubt so...
>>
>> Up until now, I have not hear
2011/5/3 Milan Knížek :
> Gnome 3 requires a hw support from the video card. Before the upgrade,
> have you successfully used some compositing window manager through x2go
> (compiz, metacity with compositing enabled)? I doubt so...
>
> Up until now, I have not heard any news that Gnome 3 would pro
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 21:59 +0200, Milan Knížek wrote:
> V Mon, 2 May 2011 02:15:38 -0700
> John Williams napsáno:
>
> > Has anyone successfully run x2goserver(-one) with Gnome 3 ?
> >
> > I just upgraded my Archlinux system to Gnome 3, and x2goserver-one
> > stopped working with Gnome. It gave
V Mon, 2 May 2011 02:15:38 -0700
John Williams napsáno:
> Has anyone successfully run x2goserver(-one) with Gnome 3 ?
>
> I just upgraded my Archlinux system to Gnome 3, and x2goserver-one
> stopped working with Gnome. It gave a message about hardware not being
> suitable and it is reverting to
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 02:15 -0700, John Williams wrote:
> Has anyone successfully run x2goserver(-one) with Gnome 3 ?
>
> I just upgraded my Archlinux system to Gnome 3, and x2goserver-one
> stopped working with Gnome. It gave a message about hardware not being
> suitable and it is reverting to gn
Has anyone successfully run x2goserver(-one) with Gnome 3 ?
I just upgraded my Archlinux system to Gnome 3, and x2goserver-one
stopped working with Gnome. It gave a message about hardware not being
suitable and it is reverting to gnome fallback. Unfortunately, it
seems it was a one-time message, b
