* On 5/17/19 10:51 PM, Ulrich Sibiller wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 9:31 PM Ulrich Sibiller
> wrote:
>> Alternatively we could add a hack: if the proxy hostname has some
>> special form, e.g. "!hostname", that very check will be skipped. As
>> proxy and normal hosts are both controlled via
Hi Uli,
I could leave with this "hack". I think we can take your patches in the
x2go client source.
regards,
Alex
Am 17.05.19 um 15:51 schrieb Ulrich Sibiller:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 9:31 PM Ulrich Sibiller
> wrote:
>> Alternatively we could add a hack: if the proxy hostname has some
>>
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 9:31 PM Ulrich Sibiller
wrote:
> Alternatively we could add a hack: if the proxy hostname has some
> special form, e.g. "!hostname", that very check will be skipped. As
> proxy and normal hosts are both controlled via the same code in
> SshmasterConnection this way the
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 5:06 PM Oleksandr Shneyder
wrote:
>
> >> technically it's a very simple solution. However I'm not sure if it
> >> worth to make UI more complicated and loaded with features which are
> >> required only by one untypical setup.
One thing here is that it used to work and
would be OK for me, but it'll require more user experience for the
client configuration. For Windows users even more, they'll need to edit
windows registry.
Am 17.05.19 um 09:44 schrieb Stefan Baur:
> Am 17.05.19 um 16:39 schrieb Oleksandr Shneyder:
>> technically it's a very simple solution.
Am 17.05.19 um 16:39 schrieb Oleksandr Shneyder:
> technically it's a very simple solution. However I'm not sure if it
> worth to make UI more complicated and loaded with features which are
> required only by one untypical setup.
> On this place I would like to ask the list members if some one has
Am 17.05.19 um 08:55 schrieb Ulrich Sibiller:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:48 PM Oleksandr Shneyder
> wrote:
>> It's not only about updating the user passwords. This kind interaction
>> could be used for 2-factor authentication and in many other cases. There
>> are many possible cases when server
Hello Uli,
It's not only about updating the user passwords. This kind interaction
could be used for 2-factor authentication and in many other cases. There
are many possible cases when server needs to have some additional
interaction with user and updating of passwords is only one of them.
After
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:48 PM Oleksandr Shneyder
wrote:
> It's not only about updating the user passwords. This kind interaction
> could be used for 2-factor authentication and in many other cases. There
> are many possible cases when server needs to have some additional
> interaction with user
> log looks the same. I think that login check is issuing a command on
> the proxy to check if the proxy is working ("echo LOGIN OK"). And due
> to the nature of our gateway (see above) this fails, because it is an
> invalid command.
>
> Unfortunately I don't really see if this assumption is
Hi,
some time ago I have successfully set up the x2goclient 4.1.0.0 for
Windows to access some Linux machines via an ssh security gateway. It
worked fine.
Yesterday I wanted to use that connection with x2gclient 4.1.2.0 and
it failed. Today I have tracked this down a bit more and can report
this
11 matches
Mail list logo
