RE: Problems with ProblemListener

2002-12-20 Thread David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 1:27 PM > To: xalan-c-users@xml.apache.org > Subject: RE: Problems with ProblemListener > > > > > > > Hi Corey, > > I think it's possible in the case of some exceptions to > report something > through

RE: Problems with ProblemListener

2002-12-20 Thread Corey Tripp
t; To: xalan-c-users@xml.apache.org > Subject: RE: Problems with ProblemListener > > > > > > > Hi Corey, > > I think it's possible in the case of some exceptions to > report something > through the ProblemListener interface. The difference would >

RE: Problems with ProblemListener

2002-12-20 Thread David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM
David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM) Subject: RE: Problems with ProblemListener

RE: Problems with ProblemListener

2002-12-18 Thread Corey Tripp
Hi Dave, > Can you describe in more detail what you're doing, and > what parts of the current mechanism work for you, and what could be > improved (aside from obvious requirement of consistent behavior)? Sure, in my application, which is multi-threaded, I have a framework for reporting error/d

Re: Problems with ProblemListener

2002-12-18 Thread David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM
Hi Corey, This doesn't surpise me. Error handling is one of the most inconsistent things in the code, and I've been trying to figure out the best way to straighten it out. On one hand, the ProblemListener mechanism is nice because it allows users to plug in special handling. Unfortunately,