DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20897] - xsl:attribute and element extensions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[jira] Closed: (XALANJ-1947) XSLTFunctions_TestIdFuncInComplexStruct

Message: The following issue has been closed. Resolver: Brian Minchau Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 2:47 PM This bug is invalid. The output produced by Xalan-J is: Test for id selection and pattern matching... Next line should read: -*id17*- -*id17*- Numbering those lines 1

[jira] Resolved: (XALANJ-1958) Stack overflow due to incorrect stylesheet

Message: The following issue has been resolved as INVALID. Resolver: Henry Zongaro Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:10 PM I believe this is reasonable behaviour. The stylesheet contains an infinite recursion - the template that matches the root node performs an apply-templates on the roo

[jira] Resolved: (XALANJ-1963) URIResolver errors

Message: The following issue has been resolved as INVALID. Resolver: Henry Zongaro Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:05 PM I believe Xalan-Java is behaving as the JAXP specification intended. This is an area of JAXP that is underspecified. What is happening is that Transformer objects in

[jira] Resolved: (XALANJ-1954) version="" is fatal error when output method is HTML

Message: The following issue has been resolved as INVALID. Resolver: Henry Zongaro Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:13 AM Xalan-Java appears to be operating correctly. - View the issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/brow

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Hi David, > > So would this be an appropriate time to move the > xml-commons repository to SVN? Well, I don't know about you, but I generally prefer to ease my way into new software tools, rather than dive right into advanced usage. So, speaking for myself, I'd prefer to wait for a period of

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Henry Zongaro wrote: Hi, Neeraj, Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/14/2004 07:53:26 AM: Michael Glavassevich wrote: Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/13/2004 10:11:00 AM: Hello All, I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ? Merging the code in branch/

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Hi, Neeraj, Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/14/2004 07:53:26 AM: > Michael Glavassevich wrote: >> Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/13/2004 10:11:00 AM: >>> >>> >>> Hello All, >>> >>> I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ? Merging >>> the code