http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2471

*** shadow/2471 Fri Jul  6 01:25:53 2001
--- shadow/2471.tmp.18795       Fri Jul  6 11:32:17 2001
***************
*** 2,9 ****
  | ClassCast Exception with  ExtensionHandlerJava::getFromCache               |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 2471                        Product: XalanJ2                 |
! |       Status: NEW                         Version: 2.0.1                   |
! |   Resolution:                            Platform: All                     |
  |     Severity: Critical                 OS/Version: Other                   |
  |     Priority: Other                     Component: org.apache.xalan.extens |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
--- 2,9 ----
  | ClassCast Exception with  ExtensionHandlerJava::getFromCache               |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 2471                        Product: XalanJ2                 |
! |       Status: RESOLVED                    Version: 2.0.1                   |
! |   Resolution: DUPLICATE                  Platform: All                     |
  |     Severity: Critical                 OS/Version: Other                   |
  |     Priority: Other                     Component: org.apache.xalan.extens |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
***************
*** 30,33 ****
  should return a Constructor but the methodKey is for an other method (a 
  java.Method for exemple).
  I don't know why this arise but I had to remove any calls to getFromCache to 
! get rid of this bug.
--- 30,38 ----
  should return a Constructor but the methodKey is for an other method (a 
  java.Method for exemple).
  I don't know why this arise but I had to remove any calls to getFromCache to 
! get rid of this bug.
! 
! ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-07-06 11:32 -------
! 
! 
! *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 2175 ***

Reply via email to